Medical Dosimetry
Volume 31, Issue 3 , Pages 216-223, Autumn 2006

Choice of beam energy and dosimetric implications for radiation treatment in a subpopulation of women with large breasts in the United States and Japan

  • Indra J. Das, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Indra J. Das, Ph.D., Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
  • ,
  • Naoto Shikama, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan
  • ,
  • Chee-Wai Cheng, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Morristown Memorial Hospital, Morristown, NJ
  • ,
  • Lawrence J. Solin, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA

Received 1 December 2005; accepted 2 February 2006.

Abstract 

Radiation complications are often related to the dose inhomogeneity (hot spot) in breast tissue treated with conservative therapy, especially for large patients. The effect of photon energy on radiation dose distribution is analyzed to provide guidelines for the selection of beam energy when tangential fields and limited slices are used to treat women with large breasts. Forty-eight patients with chest wall separation > 22 cm were selected for dosimetric analysis. We compared the maximum dose in the central axis (CAX) plane (2D) using 6-, 10-, and 18-MV photon beams in all patients and 3D data set for 16 patients. Correlation between hot spot dose (HSD), separation, breast cup size, breast volume, and body weight was derived with beam energy. Among the 48 patients in this study, HSD > 10% in the CAX plane was noted in 98%, 46%, and 4% of the population when 2D dosimetry was performed; however, with 3D study, it was in 50%, 19%, and 6% of the patients with 6-MV, 10-MV and 18-MV beams, respectively. The chest wall separation, body weight, and breast volume were correlated with the HSD in both the 2D and 3D plans. Patient’s bra size was not correlated with the hot spot. The chest wall separation was found to be the most important parameter to correlate with hot spot in tangential breast treatment. Simple guidelines are provided for dose uniformity in breast with respect to chest wall separation, body weight, bra size, and breast volume with tangential field irradiations.

Key Words:  Breast cancer , Radiation dose distribution , Hot spot , Beam energy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0958-3947(06)00047-1

doi:10.1016/j.meddos.2006.02.002

Medical Dosimetry
Volume 31, Issue 3 , Pages 216-223, Autumn 2006