Medical Dosimetry
Volume 32, Issue 3 , Pages 200-203, Autumn 2007

Experimental Investigation of the Implementation of Fermi-Eyges-Hogstrom Electron Beam Model of the Pinnacle3 System at Extended SSDs

  • Muthana Al-Ghazi, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Muthana Al-Ghazi, Ph.D., Department of Radiation Oncology, Building 23, RT 26, University of California Irvine Medical Center, 101 The City Drive, Orange, CA 92868.
  • ,
  • Varun Sehgal, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA
  • ,
  • Robert Sanford, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA
  • ,
  • Heeteak Chung, M.S.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Nuclear and Radiological Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL

Received 4 October 2005; accepted 29 January 2007.

Abstract 

A commercially available ADAC Pinnacle3 radiation treatment planning system has been used to model electron beams from a Varian Clinac 2300C/D in the energy range of 6 to 22 MeV. Prior to clinical use, the dosimetric characteristics of the beams have to be modeled accurately. As a first step for beam modeling, a number of dose profile and depth dose measurements were taken at standard source-to-surface distance (SSD) of 100 cm. Dose profiles and depth dose measurements at extended SSDs up to 120 cm are important for ascertaining accuracy of the model, as well as their clinical usefulness in the treatment of some sites (e.g., head-and-neck tumors). Modeled and measured beam data were compared. Over 98% of comparison points (modeled vs. measured) at 100-cm SSD were within 2.5% or 2.5 mm. At 110 cm SSD, over 98% of compared points were within 4% or 4 mm, and at 120-cm SSD, over 98% of compared points were within 5% or 5 mm. Overall, more than 98% of compared points were within 4% or 4 mm. Better models were produced for lower energies (6 to 15 MeV) than higher energies (18 and 22 MeV). For 6, 9, 12, and 15 MeV, 89% of compared points were within 2% or 2 mm. For 18- and 22-MeV electron energies, 75% and 67%, respectively, were within 2% or 2 mm. These results are consistent with the recommendations of AAPM Task Group Report 53.

Key Words: Electron beam modeling, Distance-to-agreement (DTA), Source-to-surface distance (SSD), Beam profiles

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0958-3947(07)00042-8

doi:10.1016/j.meddos.2007.01.012

Medical Dosimetry
Volume 32, Issue 3 , Pages 200-203, Autumn 2007