Medical Dosimetry
Volume 32, Issue 4 , Pages 281-286, Winter 2007

Impact of Endorectal Balloon in the Dosimetry of Prostate and Surrounding Tissues in Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with IMRT

Presented at the 86th Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting of Radiological Society of North America, Chicago, IL, 2000.

  • Maria T. Vlachaki, M.D., Ph.D., M.B.A.

      Affiliations

    • Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Maria T. Vlachaki, M.D., Ph.D, M.B.A., Wayne State University School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, 540 East Canfield, 1212 Scott Hall, Detroit, MI 48201.
  • ,
  • Terrance N. Teslow, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
  • ,
  • Salahuddin Ahmad, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK

Received 19 February 2007; accepted 21 February 2007.

Abstract 

The dosimetric effect of endorectal balloon repositioning or failure was assessed in 10 prostate cancer patients treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Three extreme clinical scenarios were simulated by placing the balloon in the most superior and inferior positions within the rectum and by removing the balloon. Treatment planning was performed by obtaining a computed tomography (CT) image with the balloon in the most superior position (plan 1). Subsequently, the isodose lines of plan 1 were superpositioned over the anatomy of 2 other CTs, one obtained with the balloon in the most inferior position and another without the balloon (plans 2 and 3, respectively). Dose-volume histograms (DVHs) of the prostate and surrounding tissues were generated and compared for all 3 plans. The prescribed radiation dose to the prostate and seminal vesicles was 70 Gy in 35 fractions. Balloon repositioning resulted in significant changes only for the seminal vesicles, where the minimum doses decreased from 70.39 to 61.58 Gy, and the percent volume below 70 Gy increased from 1.62% to 8.39%. Balloon failure resulted in significant decreases in mean and minimum doses for prostate from 74.36 to 72.84 Gy and 67.62 to 50.96 Gy, respectively. Similar decreases in the mean and minimum doses were also observed for seminal vesicles from 74.21 to 64.43 Gy and 70.39 to 41.74 Gy, respectively. Balloon repositioning did not affect normal tissue doses, while balloon failure significantly decreased the upper rectum mean doses from 30.79 to 19.38 Gy. This study demonstrates that repositioning of the endorectal balloon results in increased dose inhomogeneity for seminal vesicles, while balloon failure causes significant prostate and seminal vesicle underdosing without overdosing normal tissues.

Key Words: Prostate cancer, IMRT, Prostate immobilization, Endorectal balloon

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0958-3947(07)00051-9

doi:10.1016/j.meddos.2007.02.007

Medical Dosimetry
Volume 32, Issue 4 , Pages 281-286, Winter 2007