Clinical Implementation of Tangential Field Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) Using Sliding Window Technique and Dosimetric Comparison with 3D Conformal Therapy (3DCRT) in Breast Cancer

Selvaraj, Raj N.; Beriwal, Sushil; Pourarian, Roya J.; Lalonde, Ron J.; Chen, Alex; Mehta, Kiran; Brunner, Gwendolyn; Wagner, Kathy A.; Yue, Ning J.; Huq, Saiful M.; Heron, Dwight E.

doi:10.1016/j.meddos.2007.03.001

« Previous Next »Medical Dosimetry
Volume 32, Issue 4 , Pages 299-304, Winter 2007

Clinical Implementation of Tangential Field Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) Using Sliding Window Technique and Dosimetric Comparison with 3D Conformal Therapy (3DCRT) in Breast Cancer

Raj N. Selvaraj, M.S., D.A.B.R., D.A.B.M.P.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA
- Reprint requests to: Raj N. Selvaraj, M.S., D.A.B.R., D.A.B.M.P., Senior Medical Physicist, Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Physics Division, UPMC - Passavant Hospital, 9100 Babcock Boulevard, Pittsburgh, PA 15237-6913.
Sushil Beriwal, M.D.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA
Roya J. Pourarian, R.T.T., B.S.R.T.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA
Ron J. Lalonde, Ph.D.
- D3 Advanced Radiation Planning Services, Pittsburgh, PA
Alex Chen, M.D.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA
Kiran Mehta, M.D.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA
Gwendolyn Brunner, M.S.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA
Kathy A. Wagner, C.M.D.
- D3 Advanced Radiation Planning Services, Pittsburgh, PA
Ning J. Yue, Ph.D.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ
Saiful M. Huq, Ph.D.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA
Dwight E. Heron, M.D.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA

Received 9 January 2007; accepted 9 March 2007.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical implementation of tangential field IMRT using sliding window technique and to compare dosimetric parameters with 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT). Twenty breast cancer patients were randomly selected for comparison of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)-based treatment plan with 3DCRT. Inverse treatment was performed using the sliding window technique, employing the Eclipse^® Planning System (version 7.1.59, Varian, Palo Alto, CA). The dosimetric parameters compared were V₉₅ (the percentage of target volume getting ≥95% of prescribed dose), V₁₀₅, V₁₁₀, and dose homogeneity index, DHI (percentage of target volume getting between 95% and 110% of prescribed dose). The mean V₉₅, DHI, V₁₀₅, and V₁₁₀ for target volume for IMRT vs. 3D were 90.6% (standard deviation [SD]: 3.2) vs. 91% (SD: 3.0), 87.7 (SD: 6.0) vs. 82.6 (SD: 7.8), 27.3% (SD: 20.3) vs. 49.4% (SD: 14.3), and 2.8 (SD: 5.6) vs. 8.4% (SD: 7.4), respectively. DHI was increased by 6.3% with IMRT compared to 3DCRT (p < 0.05). The reductions of V₁₀₅ and V₁₁₀ for the IMRT compared to 3DCRT were 44.7% and 66.3%, respectively (p < 0.01). The mean dose and V₃₀ for heart with IMRT were 2.3 (SD: 1.1) and 1.05 (SD: 1.5) respectively, which was a reduction by 6.8% and 7.9%, respectively, in comparison with 3D. Similarly, the mean dose and V₂₀ for the ipsilateral lung and the percentage of volume of contralateral volume lung receiving > 5% of prescribed dose with IMRT were reduced by 9.9%, 2.2%, and 35%, respectively. The mean of total monitor units used for IMRT and 3DCRT was about the same (397 vs. 387). The tangential field IMRT for intact breast using sliding window technique was successfully implemented in the clinic. We have now treated more than 1000 breast cancer patients with this technique. The dosimetric data suggest improved dose homogeneity in the breast and reduction in the dose to lung and heart for IMRT treatments, which may be of clinical value in potentially contributing to improved cosmetic results and reduced late treatment-related toxicity.