Medical Dosimetry
Volume 33, Issue 3 , Pages 180-190, Autumn 2008

Feasibility of IMRT to Cover Pelvic Nodes While Escalating the Dose to the Prostate Gland: Dosimetric Data on 35 Consecutive Patients

  • John E. Bayouth, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Health Care, Iowa City, IA
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: John E. Bayouth, Ph.D., Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Health Care, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA 52242.
  • ,
  • John Pena, M.S.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medical Physics, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX
  • ,
  • Laura Culp, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX
  • ,
  • Collin Brack, M.B.A.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medical Physics, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX
  • ,
  • Giuseppe Sanguineti, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX

Received 24 January 2007; accepted 26 May 2007. published online 06 December 2007.

Abstract 

Utilizing available dosimetric and acute toxicity data, we confirm the feasibility of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) to include treatment of the pelvic nodes (PN) while escalating the dose to the prostate. Data were obtained from 35 consecutive patients with prostate cancer with ≥15% risk of PN involvement. Patients received an initial boost to the prostate, delivering 16 Gy over 8 fractions using a 6-field conformal technique, followed by an 8-field coplanar inverse planning IMRT technique delivering an additional 60 Gy over 30 fractions to the prostate (76 Gy total) and 54 Gy over 30 fractions to the seminal vesicles (SV) and PN. Dose-volume histogram analysis was performed for planning target volumes and organs at risk. Acute toxicity (RTOG/EORTC scale) was prospectively and independently scored weekly for each patient. The maximum, mean, minimum dose, and D95 to each planning target volume is provided: prostate (82.2, 78.2, 72.6, 75.2 Gy), SV (79.0, 72.5, 56.9, 61.1 Gy), and PN (80.4, 59.7, 46.5, 53.3 Gy), respectively. The percent volume receiving a dose at or above “x” Gy (Vx) was recorded for V75, V70, V65, V60, and V50 as: bladder (14%, 24%, 32%, 39%, and 54%) and rectum (3%, 18%, 26%, 34%, and 51%), respectively. Acute toxicity was as follows: 54% grade 2+ GI (n = 19), 25% grade 2+ GU (n = 9). IMRT enables treatment of pelvic nodes while escalating dose to the prostate and is clinically feasible with acute toxicity within expected ranges.

Key Words: Radiotherapy, Intensity-modulated, Radiotherapy planning, Computer-assisted, Radiation tolerance, Lymph nodes, Pelvis

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0958-3947(07)00111-2

doi:10.1016/j.meddos.2007.05.006

Medical Dosimetry
Volume 33, Issue 3 , Pages 180-190, Autumn 2008