Medical Dosimetry
Volume 33, Issue 4 , Pages 299-302 , Winter 2008

Comparison of Traditional and Simultaneous IMRT Boost Technique Basing on Therapeutic Gain Calculation

Received 30 June 2007 ,Accepted 12 December 2007.

References 

  1. Knee R, Fields RS, Peters LJ. Concomitant boost radiotherapy for advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Radiother. Oncol. 1985;4:1–7
  2. Lebesque JV, Keus RB. The simultaneous boost technique: The concept of relative normalized total dose. Radiother. Oncol. 1991;22:45–55
  3. Stavrev P, Hristov D. Prostate IMRT fractionation strategies: Two-phase treatment versus simultaneous integrated boost. Radiol. Oncol. 2003;37:115–126
  4. Simmel H. Significant reduction of dose with IMRT – boost at organ at risk compared with 3D-conformal-boost on selected clinical application. 2001;9th European Users Meeting, San Margherita di Pula, Sardinia, Italy, June 7–10, pp.125–131.
  5. Steel EG. Basic Clinical Radiobiology. London: Edward Arnold Publishers; 1993;
  6. Song W. Limitation of a convolution method for modeling geometric uncertainties in radiation therapy: The radiobiological dose-per-fraction effect. Med. Phys. 2004;31:3034–3045
  7. Wigg, D.R. Applied Radiobiology and Bioeffect Planning. Madison, WI: Medical Physics Publishing;
  8. Maciejewski B, et al. Radiobiological rational for advantages and limitations of IMRT in clinical practice. 2001;9th European Users Meeting, San Margherita di Pula, Sardinia, Italy, June 7–10

PII: S0958-3947(08)00036-8

doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2008.02.001

Medical Dosimetry
Volume 33, Issue 4 , Pages 299-302 , Winter 2008