Medical Dosimetry
Volume 34, Issue 3 , Pages 228-232, Autumn 2009

Skin Dose Impact from Vacuum Immobilization Device and Carbon Fiber Couch in Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer

  • Kuo-Wei Lee, M.S.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
    • Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
    • Department of Engineering and System Science, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan
    • Division of Health Physics, Institute of Nuclear Energy Research, Taoyuan, Taiwan
  • ,
  • Jian-Kuen Wu, M.S.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
  • ,
  • Shiu-Chen Jeng, M.S.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
  • ,
  • Yen-Wan Hsueh Liu, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Engineering and System Science, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan
  • ,
  • Jason Chia-Hsien Cheng, M.D., Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
    • Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Jason Chia-Hsien Cheng, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, No. 7 Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei 100, Taiwan

Received 15 July 2008; accepted 23 October 2008. published online 22 December 2008.

Abstract 

To investigate the unexpected skin dose increase from intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) on vacuum cushions and carbon-fiber couches and then to modify the dosimetric plan accordingly. Eleven prostate cancer patients undergoing IMRT were treated in prone position with a vacuum cushion. Two under-couch beams scattered the radiation from the vacuum cushion and carbon-fiber couch. The IMRT plans with both devices contoured were compared with the plans not contouring them. The skin doses were measured using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) placed on the inguinal regions in a single IMRT fraction. Tissue equivalent thickness was transformed for both devices with the relative densities. The TLD-measured skin doses (59.5 ± 9.5 cGy and 55.6 ± 5.9 cGy at left and right inguinal regions, respectively) were significantly higher than the calculated doses (28.7 ± 4.7 cGy; p = 2.2 × 10−5 and 26.2 ± 4.3 cGy; p = 1.5 × 10−5) not contouring the vacuum cushion and carbon-fiber couch. The calculated skin doses with both devices contoured (59.1 ± 8.8 cGy and 55.5 ± 5.7 cGy) were similar to the TLD-measured doses. In addition, the calculated skin doses using the vacuum cushion and a converted thickness of the simulator couch were no different from the TLD-measured doses. The recalculated doses of rectum and bladder did not change significantly. The dose that covered 95% of target volume was less than the prescribed dose in 4 of 11 patients, and this problem was solved after re-optimization applying the corrected contours. The vacuum cushion and carbon-fiber couch contributed to increased skin doses. The tissue-equivalent-thickness method served as an effective way to correct the dose variations.

Key Words: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy, Prostate cancer, Skin, Vacuum immobilization device, Couch

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0958-3947(08)00163-5

doi:10.1016/j.meddos.2008.10.001

Medical Dosimetry
Volume 34, Issue 3 , Pages 228-232, Autumn 2009