Medical Dosimetry
Volume 35, Issue 1 , Pages 43-48, Spring 2010

Dosimetric Impact of Intrafractional Patient Motion in Pediatric Brain Tumor Patients

  • Chris Beltran, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Chris Beltran, PhD., St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Radiological Sciences, 262 Danny Thomas Place, MS# 220, Memphis TN 38105
  • ,
  • John Trussell
  • ,
  • Thomas E. Merchant, D.O., Ph.D.

Radiological Sciences, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis TN

Received 18 September 2008; accepted 12 January 2009. published online 23 February 2009.

Abstract 

The purpose of this study was to determine the dosimetric consequences of intrafractional patient motion on the clinical target volume (CTV), spinal cord, and optic nerves for non-sedated pediatric brain tumor patients. The patients were immobilized for treatment using a customized thermoplastic full-face mask and bite-block attached to an array of reflectors. The array was optically tracked by infra-red cameras at a frequency of 10 Hz. Patients were localized based on skin/mask marks and weekly films were taken to ensure proper setup. Before each noncoplanar field was delivered, the deviation from baseline of the array was recorded. The systematic error (SE) and random error (RE) were calculated. Direct simulation of the intrafractional motion was used to quantify the dosimetric changes to the targets and critical structures. Nine patients utilizing the optical tracking system were evaluated. The patient cohort had a mean of 31 ± 1.5 treatment fractions; motion data were acquired for a mean of 26 ± 6.2 fractions. The mean age was 15.6 ± 4.1 years. The SE and RE were 0.4 and 1.1 mm in the posterior-anterior, 0.5 and 1.0 mm in left-right, and 0.6 and 1.3 mm in superior-inferior directions, respectively. The dosimetric effects of the motion on the CTV were negligible; however, the dose to the critical structures was increased. Patient motion during treatment does affect the dose to critical structures, therefore, planning risk volumes are needed to properly assess the dose to normal tissues. Because the motion did not affect the dose to the CTV, the 3-mm PTV margin used is sufficient to account for intrafractional motion, given the patient is properly localized at the start of treatment.

Key Words: Pediatric brain tumor, intra-fraction motion, target localization

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0958-3947(09)00006-5

doi:10.1016/j.meddos.2009.01.004

Medical Dosimetry
Volume 35, Issue 1 , Pages 43-48, Spring 2010