Journal Home
Search for

Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages 101-107 (Summer 2010)


View previous. 4 of 11 View next.

Incorporating Heterogeneity Correction and 4DCT in Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT): The Effect on Target Coverage, Organ-At-Risk Doses, and Dose Conformity

Presented in part at the 48th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, Philadelphia, 2006.

Kevin N. Franks, M.D.a, Thomas G. Purdie, Ph.D.abCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Laura A. Dawson, M.D.ab, Andrea Bezjak, M.D., M.Sc.ab, David A. Jaffray, Ph.D.abc, Jean-Pierre Bissonnette, Ph.D.ab

Received 15 July 2008; accepted 10 March 2009. published online 18 May 2009.

Abstract 

This study evaluates the dosimetric impact of 4-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) target volumes and heterogeneity correction (HC) on target coverage, organ-at-risk (OAR) doses, and dose conformity in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Twelve patients with lung cancer, scanned using both helical CT and 4DCT, were treated with SBRT (60 Gy in 3 fractions). The clinical plans were calculated without HC and based on targets from the free-breathing helical CT scan (PTVHEL). Retrospectively, the clinical plans were recalculated with HC and were evaluated based on targets from 4DCT datasets (PTV4D) accounting for patient-specific target motion. The PTV4D was greater than PTVHEL when tumor motion exceeded 7.5 mm (vector). There were significant decreases in target coverage (V100) for the recalculated vs. clinical plans (0.84 vs. 0.94, p < 0.02) for the same monitor units. When the recalculated plans were optimized for equivalent V100 of the clinical plans, there were significant increases in the 60-Gy dose spillage (1.27 vs. 1.13, p < 0.001) and 30-Gy dose spillage (5.20 vs. 3.73, p < 0.001) vs. the clinical plans. There was a significant increase (p < 0.04) in the mean OAR doses between the optimized re-calculated and the clinical plan. Tumor motion is an important consideration for target volumes defined using helical CT. Lower prescription doses may be required when prospectively planning with HC to achieve a similar level of toxicity and dose spillage as expected when planning based on homogeneous dose calculations.

a Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

b Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

c Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Thomas G. Purdie, Ph.D., Department of Radiation Physics, Princess Margaret Hospital, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

PII: S0958-3947(09)00013-2

doi:10.1016/j.meddos.2009.03.007


View previous. 4 of 11 View next.