Medical Dosimetry
Volume 35, Issue 2 , Pages 128-134, Summer 2010

Dosimetric Comparison Between Intensity-Modulated with Coplanar Field and 3D Conformal Radiotherapy with Noncoplanar Field for Postocular Invasion Tumor

  • Tu Wenyong, M.D., Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Nuclear Medicine Technology Institution, School of Clinical Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing
    • Radiatherapy Department, Nanjing Second Hospital, Nanjing
  • ,
  • Liu Lu, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Nuclear Medicine Technology Institution, School of Clinical Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Liu Lu, M.D., Nuclear Medicine Technology Institution, School of Clinical Medicine, Southeast University, No.87, Dingjia Qiao Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province (210009), China
  • ,
  • Zeng Jun, M.D., Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Radiotherapy Department, YI-REN Hospital, Wuxi, Jiangsu Province, China
  • ,
  • Yin Weidong, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Radiatherapy Department, Nanjing Second Hospital, Nanjing
  • ,
  • Li Yun, B.A.

      Affiliations

    • Radiotherapy Department, YI-REN Hospital, Wuxi, Jiangsu Province, China

Received 2 December 2008; accepted 3 April 2009. published online 01 June 2009.

Abstract 

This study presents a dosimetric optimization effort aiming to compare noncoplanar field (NCF) on 3 dimensions conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and coplanar field (CF) on intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) planning for postocular invasion tumor. We performed a planning study on the computed tomography data of 8 consecutive patients with localized postocular invasion tumor. Four fields NCF 3D-CRT in the transverse plane with gantry angles of 0–10°, 30–45°, 240–270°, and 310–335° degrees were isocentered at the center of gravity of the target volume. The geometry of the beams was determined by beam's eye view. The same constraints were prepared with between CF IMRT optimization and NCF 3D-CRT treatment. The maximum point doses (D max) for the different optic pathway structures (OPS) with NCF 3D-CRT treatment should differ in no more than 3% from those with the NCF IMRT plan. Dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were obtained for all targets and organ at risk (OAR) with both treatment techniques. Plans with NCF 3D-CRT and CF IMRT constraints on target dose in homogeneity were computed, as well as the conformity index (CI) and homogeneity index (HI) in the target volume. The PTV coverage was optimal with both NCF 3D-CRT and CF IMRT plans in the 8 tumor sites. No difference was noted between the two techniques for the average Dmax and Dmin dose. NCF 3D-CRT and CF IMRT will yield similar results on CI. However, HI was a significant difference between NCF 3D-CRT and CF IMRT plan (p < 0.001). Physical endpoints for target showed the mean target dose to be low in the CF IMRT plan, caused by a large target dose in homogeneity (p < 0.001). The impact of NCF 3D-CRT versus CF IMRT set-up is very slight. NCF3D-CRT is one of the treatment options for postocular invasion tumor. However, constraints for OARs are needed.

Key Words: Noncoplanar field, 3 dimension conformal radiotherapy, Coplanar field, Intensity-modulated radiotherapy, Postocular invasion tumor

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0958-3947(09)00028-4

doi:10.1016/j.meddos.2009.04.002

Medical Dosimetry
Volume 35, Issue 2 , Pages 128-134, Summer 2010