Medical Dosimetry
Volume 35, Issue 2 , Pages 135-142 , Summer 2010

3D-Conformal Versus Intensity-Modulated Postoperative Radiotherapy of Vaginal Vault: A Dosimetric Comparison

  • Savino Cilla, M.P.

      Affiliations

    • Medical Physics Unit, Department of Oncology, “John Paul II” Center for High Technology Research and Education in Biomedical Sciences, Catholic University, Campobasso, Italy
  • ,
  • Gabriella Macchia, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Radiotherapy Unit, Department of Oncology, “John Paul II” Center for High Technology Research and Education in Biomedical Sciences, Catholic University, Campobasso, Italy
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Gabriella Macchia, M.D., Radiotherapy Unit-Department of Oncology, Catholic University, Largo A. Gemelli 1, 86100 Campobasso, Italy
  • ,
  • Cinzia Digesù, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Radiotherapy Unit, Department of Oncology, “John Paul II” Center for High Technology Research and Education in Biomedical Sciences, Catholic University, Campobasso, Italy
  • ,
  • Francesco Deodato, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Radiotherapy Unit, Department of Oncology, “John Paul II” Center for High Technology Research and Education in Biomedical Sciences, Catholic University, Campobasso, Italy
  • ,
  • Michele Romanella, R.T.

      Affiliations

    • Radiotherapy Unit, Department of Oncology, “John Paul II” Center for High Technology Research and Education in Biomedical Sciences, Catholic University, Campobasso, Italy
  • ,
  • Gabriella Ferrandina, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Gynaecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, “John Paul II” Center for High Technology Research and Education in Biomedical Sciences, Catholic University, Campobasso, Italy
  • ,
  • Gilbert D.A. Padula, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, The Lacks Cancer Center Saint Mary's Health Care, Grand Rapids, MI
  • ,
  • Vincenzo Picardi, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Radiotherapy Unit, Department of Oncology, “John Paul II” Center for High Technology Research and Education in Biomedical Sciences, Catholic University, Campobasso, Italy
  • ,
  • Giovanni Scambia, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Gynaecology/Obstetrics Department, Policlinico A. Gemelli, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
  • ,
  • Angelo Piermattei, M.P.

      Affiliations

    • Medical Physics Unit, Department of Oncology, “John Paul II” Center for High Technology Research and Education in Biomedical Sciences, Catholic University, Campobasso, Italy
  • ,
  • Alessio Giuseppe Morganti, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Radiotherapy Unit, Department of Oncology, “John Paul II” Center for High Technology Research and Education in Biomedical Sciences, Catholic University, Campobasso, Italy

Received 17 March 2009 ,Accepted 22 April 2009.

References 

  1. Keys HM, Roberts JA, Brunetto VL, et al. A phase III trial of surgery with or without adjunctive external pelvic radiation therapy in intermediate risk endometrial adenocarcinoma: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol. Oncol. 2004;92:744–751
  2. Creutzberg CL, van Putten WLJ, Koper PCM, et al. Surgery and postoperative radiotherapy versus surgery alone for patients with stage-1 endometrial carcinoma: Multicentre randomised trial. Lancet. 2000;355:1404–1411
  3. Soderini A, Anchezar JP, Sardi JE. Role of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) in intermediate risk (1b G2-3-1C) endometrioid carcinoma (EC) after extended staging surgery (ESS) (Preliminary reports of a randomised trial). Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer. 2003;13:78;(abstract P0147)
  4. Kong A, Simera I, Collinwood M, et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy for stage I endometrial cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann. Oncol. 2007;18:1595–1604
  5. Creasman WT, Morrow CP, Bundy BN, et al. Surgical pathologic spread patterns of endometrial cancer (A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study). Cancer. 1987;60:2035–2041
  6. Morrow CP, Bundy BN, Kurman RJ, et al. Relationship between surgical-pathological risk factors and outcome in clinical stage I and II carcinoma of the endometrium: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol. Oncol. 1991;40:55–65
  7. Alektiar KM, Venkatraman E, Chi DS, et al. Intravaginal brachytherapy alone for intermediate-risk endometrial cancer. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2005;62:111–117
  8. Jolly S, Vargas C, Kumar T, et al. Vaginal brachytherapy alone: An alternative to adjuvant whole pelvis radiation for early stage endometrial cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 2005;97:887–892
  9. Chong I, Hoskin P. Vaginal vault brachytherapy as sole postoperative treatment for low-risk endometrial cancer. Brachytherapy. 2008;7:195–199
  10. Mundt AJ, Lujan AE, Rotmensch J, et al. Intensity-modulated whole pelvic radiotherapy in women with gynaecologic malignancies. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2002;52:1330–1337
  11. Ahamad A, Jhingran A. New radiation techniques in gynaecological cancer. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer. 2004;14:569–579
  12. Portelance L, Chao KS, Grigsby PW, et al. Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) reduces small bowel, rectum, and bladder doses in patients with cervical cancer receiving pelvic and para-aortic irradiation. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2001;51:261–266
  13. Wahab SH, Malyapa RS, Mutic S, et al. A treatment planning study comparing HDR and AGIMRT for cervical cancer. Med. Phys. 2004;31:734–743
  14. Guerrero M, Li XA, Ma L, et al. Simultaneous integrated intensity-modulated radiotherapy boost for locally advanced gynaecological cancer (Radiobiological and dosimetric considerations). Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2005;62:933–939
  15. Mundt AJ, Lujan AE, Rotmensch J, et al. Intensity-modulated whole pelvic radiotherapy in women with gynecologic malignancies. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2002;52:1330–1337
  16. Portelance L, Chao KS, Grigsby PW, et al. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) reduces small bowel, rectum, and bladder doses in patients with cervical cancer receiving pelvic and para-aortic irradiation. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2001;51:261–266
  17. Ahamad A, D'Souza W, Salehpour M, et al. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy after hysterectomy: Comparison with conventional treatment and sensitivity of the normal-tissue-sparing effect to margin size. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2005;62:1117–1124
  18. Heron DE, Gerszten K, Selvaraj RN, et al. Conventional 3D conformal versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy for the adjuvant treatment of gynecologic malignancies: A comparative dosimetric study of dose-volume histograms small star, filled. Gynecol. Oncol. 2003;91:39–45
  19. D'Souza WD, Ahamad AA, Iyer RB, et al. Feasibility of dose escalation using intensity-modulated radiotherapy in posthysterectomy cervical carcinoma. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2005;61:1062–1070
  20. Nutting CM, Convery DJ, Cosgrove VP, et al. Reduction of small and large bowel irradiation using an optimized intensity-modulated pelvic radiotherapy technique in patients with prostate cancer. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2000;48:649–656
  21. Aydogan B. A dosimetric analysis of IMRT as an alternative to adjuvant high-dose rate (HDR) brachyterapy in early endometrial cancer patients. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2006;65:266–273
  22. Bortfeld T, Schlegel W, Rhein B. Decomposition of pencil beam kernels for fast dose calculations in three-dimensional treatment planning. Med. Phys. 1993;20:311–318
  23. Wu Q, Mohan R, Morris M, et al. Simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy for locally advanced head-and-neck squamous cell carcinomas. I: Dosimetric results. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2003;56:573–585
  24. Van't Riet A, Mak AC, Moerland MA, et al. A conformation number to quantify the degree of conformality in brachytherapy and external beam irradiation: Application to the prostate. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 1997;37:731–736
  25. Molla M, Escude L, Nouet P, et al. Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy boost for gynecologic tumors: An alternative to brachytherapy?. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2005;62:118–124
  26. Chan P, Milosevic M, Fyles A, et al. Intrafractional movement of the uterus and cervix in patients with cervix cancer receiving radiotherapy: An MRI-based point-of-interest (POI) analysis. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2004;60:S305
  27. Low DA, Grigsby PW, Dempsey JF, et al. Applicator guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2002;52:1400–1406

PII: S0958-3947(09)00047-8

doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2009.04.003

Medical Dosimetry
Volume 35, Issue 2 , Pages 135-142 , Summer 2010