Journal Home
Search for

Articles in Press

Return to articles in press list

Effect of brain stem and dorsal vagus complex dosimetry on nausea and vomiting in head and neck intensity-modulated radiation therapy

Katherine Ciura, B.A., R.T. (T)a, Michelle McBurney, B.S., R.T. (R)(T)a, Baongoc Nguyen, A.S.a, Mary Pham, B.S.aCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Neal Rebueno, CMDb, Clifton D. Fuller, M.D.c, Nandita Guha-Thakurta, M.D.c, David I. Rosenthal, M.D.b

Received 12 February 2009; accepted 7 September 2009. published online 25 January 2010.
Corrected Proof

Abstract 

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is becoming the treatment of choice for many head and neck cancer patients. IMRT reduces some toxicities by reducing radiation dose to uninvolved normal tissue near tumor targets; however, other tissues not irradiated using previous 3D techniques may receive clinically significant doses, causing undesirable side effects including nausea and vomiting (NV). Irradiation of the brainstem, and more specifically, the area postrema and dorsal vagal complex (DVC), has been linked to NV. We previously reported preliminary hypothesis-generating dose effects associated with NV in IMRT patients. The goal of this study is to relate brainstem dose to NV symptoms. We retrospectively studied 100 consecutive patients that were treated for oropharyngeal cancer with IMRT. We contoured the brainstem, area postrema, and DVC with the assistance of an expert diagnostic neuroradiologist. We correlated dosimetry for the 3 areas contoured with weekly NV rates during IMRT. NV rates were significantly higher for patients who received concurrent chemotherapy. Post hoc analysis demonstrated that chemoradiation cases exhibited a trend towards the same dose-response relationship with both brainstem mean dose (p = 0.0025) and area postrema mean dose (p = 0.004); however, both failed to meet statistical significance at the p ≤ 0.002 level. Duration of toxicity was also greater for chemoradiation patients, who averaged 3.3 weeks with reported Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTC-AE), compared with an average of 2 weeks for definitive RT patients (p = 0.002). For definitive RT cases, no dose-response trend could be ascertained. The mean brainstem dose emerged as a key parameter of interest; however, no one dose parameter (mean/median/EUD) best correlated with NV. This study does not address extraneous factors that would affect NV incidence, including the use of antiemetics, nor chemotherapy dose schedule specifics before and during RT. A prospective study will be required to depict exactly how IMRT dose affects NV.

a School of Health Sciences, Medical Dosimetry Program, Anderson Cancer Center, Houston

b Department of Radiation Oncology, Anderson Cancer Center, Houston

c Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; and Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Mary Pham, B.S., Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030

PII: S0958-3947(09)00128-9

doi:10.1016/j.meddos.2009.11.002