Medical Dosimetry
Volume 36, Issue 2 , Pages 188-194, Summer 2011

Interfraction Prostate Rotation Determined from In-Room Computerized Tomography Images

Presented in part at ESTRO 27, September 14 to 18, 2008; Gothenburg, Sweden.

  • Rebecca Owen, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Radiation Oncology Mater Center, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Radiation Therapy Services, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victoria, Australia
    • School of Medical Radiation Sciences, University of Sydney, Lidcombe, New South Wales, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Rebecca Owen, Ph.D., Radiation Therapy Services, Radiation Oncology Mater Center, 31 Raymond Terrace, South Brisbane, Queensland, 4101 Australia
  • ,
  • Tomas Kron, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victoria, Australia
  • ,
  • Farshad Foroudi, M.B.B.S., F.R.A.N.Z.C.R.

      Affiliations

    • Division of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victoria, Australia
  • ,
  • Alvin Milner, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victoria, Australia
  • ,
  • Jennifer Cox, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • School of Medical Radiation Sciences, University of Sydney, Lidcombe, New South Wales, Australia
  • ,
  • Gillian Duchesne, M.D., F.R.A.N.Z.C.R.

      Affiliations

    • Division of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victoria, Australia

Received 9 March 2009; accepted 9 March 2010. published online 21 June 2010.

Abstract 

Fiducial markers (FMs) are commonly used as a correction technique for interfraction translations of the prostate. The aim of this investigation was to determine the magnitude of prostate rotations using 2 methods: FM coordinates and the anatomical border of the prostate and rectum. Daily computed tomography (CT) scans (n = 346) of 10 prostate cancer patients with 3 implanted FMs were acquired using the CT on rails. FM coordinates were used to determine rotation in the sagittal, transverse, and coronal planes, and CT contours of the prostate and rectum were used to determine rotation along the sagittal plane. An adaptive technique based on a subset of images (n = 6; planning and first 5 treatment CTs) to reduce systematic rotation errors in the sagittal plane was tested. The standard deviation (SD) of systematic rotation from FM coordinates was 7.6°, 7.7°, and 5.0° in the sagittal, transverse and coronal planes. The corresponding SD of random error was 10.2°, 15.8°, and 6.5°. Errors in the sagittal plane, determined from prostate and rectal contours, were 10.1° (systematic) and 7.7° (random). These results did not correlate with rotation computed from FM coordinates (r = −0.017; p = 0.753, n = 337). The systematic error could be reduced by 43% to 5.6° when the mean prostate position was estimated from 6 CT scans. Prostate rotation is a significant source of error that appears to be more accurately determined using the anatomical border of the prostate and rectum rather than FMs, thus highlighting the utility of CT image guidance.

Key Words: Prostate rotation, In-room CT, Fiducial markers

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0958-3947(10)00029-4

doi:10.1016/j.meddos.2010.03.002

Medical Dosimetry
Volume 36, Issue 2 , Pages 188-194, Summer 2011