Dose to the contralateral breast: A comparison of two techniques using the enhanced dynamic wedge versus a standard wedge

References 

1. Fisher B, Anderson S, Redmond C, Wolmark N, Wickerham L, Cronin W. Re-analysis and results after 12 years of follow-up in a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy with lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer. NEJM. 1995;Vol. 333(No. 22):1456–1461
2. de la Rochefordordiere A, Abner A, Silver B, Vicini F, Recht A, Harris JR. Are cosmetic results following conservation surgery and radiation therapy for early breast cancer dependent on technique. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 1992;23:925–931
   • Abstract
   • Full-Text PDF (913 KB)
   • CrossRef
3. Cumberlin RL, Dritchilo A, Mossman KL. Carcinogenic effects of scattered dose associated with radiation therapy. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 1989;17:623–629
   • Abstract
   • Full-Text PDF (926 KB)
   • CrossRef
4. Boice JD, Harvey EB, Blettner M, Stovall M, Flamey JT. Cancer in the contralateral breast after radiotherapy for breast cancer. NEJM. 1992;326:781–785
5. Jacobson JA, Danforth DN, Cowan Kenneth H, D'Angelo T, Steinberg S, Pierce L, et al. Ten-year results of a comparison of conservation with mastectomy in the treatment of stage I and II breast cancer. NEJM. 1995;332:907–911
6. Storm HH, Andersson M, Boice JD, Blettner M, Stovall M, Mouridson HT, et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy and risk of contralateral breast cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1992;84:1245–1250
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
7. Kelly CA, Wang XY, Chu JC, Hartsell WF. Dose to contralateral breast: a comparison of four primary breast irradiation techniques. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 1996;34:727–732
   • Abstract
   • Full-Text PDF (2030 KB)
   • CrossRef
8. Siddon RL, Buck BA, Harris JR, Svensson GK. Threefield technique for breast irradiation using tangential field concern blocks. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 1983;9:583–588
   • Abstract
   • Full-Text PDF (1235 KB)
   • CrossRef
9. Fraass BA, Roberson PL, Lichter AS. Dose to the contralateral breast due to primary breast irradiation. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 1985;11:485–497
   • Abstract
   • Full-Text PDF (4090 KB)
   • CrossRef
10. Leavitt DD. Dynamic beam shaping. Med. Dosim. 1990;15:47–50
    • MEDLINE
11. Leavitt DD, Martin M, Moeller JH, Lee WL. Dynamic wedge field techniques through computer-controlled collimator motion and dose delivery. Med. Phys. 1990;17:87–91
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
12. Klien EE, Low DA, Meigooni AS, Purdy JA. Dosimetry and clinical implementation of dynamic wedge. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 1995;31:583–592
    • Full-Text PDF (1319 KB)
    • CrossRef
13. Leavitt DD. Remote wedging and intensity modification. USCF Current Approaches to Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics. March 1995; San Francisco, CA
14. Weides CD, Mok EC, Chang WC, Findley DO, Shostak CA. Evaluating the dose to the contralateral breast when using a dynamic wedge versus a regular wedge. Med. Dosim. 1995;20:287–293
    • Abstract
    • Full-Text PDF (2559 KB)
    • CrossRef
15. Swift M, Morrell D, Massey RB, Chase CL. Incidence of cancers in 161 families affected by ataxia-telangiectasia. NEJM. 1991;325:1831–1836
16. Hall EJ. Radiobiology for the radiologist. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott Company; 1994;
17. Hancock SL, Tucker MA, Hoppe RT. Breast cancer after treatment of Hodgkin's disease. JNCI. 1993;85:25–31