<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><channel rdf:about="http://www.meddos.org/?rss=yes"><title>Medical Dosimetry</title><description>Medical Dosimetry RSS feed: Current Issue.    
 Medical Dosimetry , the official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists, is the key source of information 
on new developments for the medical dosimetrist. Practical and comprehensive in coverage, the journal features original contributions 
and review articles by medical dosimetrists, oncologists, physicists, and radiation therapy technologists on clinical applications and 
techniques of external beam, interstitial, intracavitary and intraluminal irradiation in cancer management. Articles dealing primarily 
with physics will be reviewed by a specially appointed team of experts in the field. 
 Visit the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists 
Website at:  http://www.medicaldosimetry.org !   </description><link>http://www.meddos.org/?rss=yes</link><dc:publisher>Elsevier Inc.</dc:publisher><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:rights> Crown Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. </dc:rights><prism:publicationName>Medical Dosimetry</prism:publicationName><prism:issn>0958-3947</prism:issn><prism:volume>37</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:publicationDate>Summer 2012</prism:publicationDate><prism:copyright> Crown Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. </prism:copyright><prism:rightsAgent>healthpermissions@elsevier.com</prism:rightsAgent><items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394711000586/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394711000598/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394711000793/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS095839471100080X/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394711001099/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394711001105/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394711001117/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394711001129/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394711001130/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394711001142/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394711001154/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394711001166/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394711001178/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS095839471100149X/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394711001506/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394711001543/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394711001555/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394711001567/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394711001579/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394711001580/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394711001592/abstract?rss=yes"/></rdf:Seq></items></channel><item rdf:about="http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394711000586/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Using kV-kV and CBCT imaging to evaluate rectal cancer patient position when treated prone on a newly available belly board</title><link>http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394711000586/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: 
The goal of this work was to use daily kV-kV imaging and weekly cone-beam CT (CBCT) to evaluate rectal cancer patient position when treated on a new couch top belly board (BB). Quality assurance (QA) of the imaging system was conducted weekly to ensure proper performance. The positional uncertainty of the combined kV-kV image match and subsequent couch move was found to be no more than ± 1.0 mm. The average (1 SD) CBCT QA phantom match was anterior-posterior (AP) = −0.8 ± 0.2 mm, superior-inferior (SI) = 0.9 ± 0.2 mm, and left-right (LR) = −0.1 ± 0.1 mm. For treatment, a set of orthogonal kV-kV images were taken and a bony anatomy match performed online. Moves were made along each axis (AP, SI, and LR) and recorded for analysis. CBCT data were acquired once every 5 fractions for a total of 5 images per patient. The images were all taken after the couch move but before treatment. A 3-dimensional (3D-3D) bony anatomy auto-match was performed offline and the residual difference in position recorded for analysis. The average (± 1 SD) move required from skin marks, calculated over all 375 fractions (15 patients × 25 fractions/patient), were AP = −2.6 ± 3.7 mm, SI = −0.3 ± 4.9 mm, and LR = 1.8 ± 4.5 mm. The average residual difference in patient position calculated from the weekly CBCT data (75 total) were AP = −1.7 ± 0.4 mm, SI = 1.1 ± 0.6 mm, and LR = −0.5 ± 0.2 mm. These results show that the BB does provide simple patient positioning that is accurate to within ± 2.0 mm when using online orthogonal kV-kV image matching of the pelvic bony anatomy.
</description><dc:title>Using kV-kV and CBCT imaging to evaluate rectal cancer patient position when treated prone on a newly available belly board</dc:title><dc:creator>Gavin Cranmer-Sargison, Vijayananda Kundapur, Deluan Tu, Shyanne Ternes, Haresh Vachhrajani, Narinder P. Sidhu</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.meddos.2011.02.002</dc:identifier><dc:source>Medical Dosimetry 37, 2 (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-04-18</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Medical Dosimetry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-04-18</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>37</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0958-3947(11)X0007-9</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>117</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>121</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394711000598/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Effect of beam arrangement on oral cavity dose in external beam radiotherapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma</title><link>http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394711000598/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: 
This study compared the oral cavity dose between the routine 7-beam intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) beam arrangement and 2 other 7-beam IMRT with the conventional radiotherapy beam arrangements in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Ten NPC patients treated by the 7-beam routine IMRT technique (IMRT-7R) between April 2009 and June 2009 were recruited. Using the same computed tomography data, target information, and dose constraints for all the contoured structures, 2 IMRT plans with alternative beam arrangements (IMRT-7M and IMRT-7P) by avoiding the anterior facial beam and 1 conventional radiotherapy plan (CONRT) were computed using the Pinnacle treatment planning system. Dose-volume histograms were generated for the planning target volumes (PTVs) and oral cavity from which the dose parameters and the conformity index of the PTV were recorded for dosimetric comparisons among the plans with different beam arrangements. The dose distributions to the PTVs were similar among the 3 IMRT beam arrangements, whereas the differences were significant between IMRT-7R and CONRT plans. For the oral cavity dose, the 3 IMRT beam arrangements did not show significant difference. Compared with IMRT-7R, CONRT plan showed a significantly lower mean dose, V30 and V-40, whereas the V-60 was significantly higher. The 2 suggested alternative beam arrangements did not significantly reduce the oral cavity dose. The impact of varying the beam angles in IMRT of NPC did not give noticeable effect on the target and oral cavity. Compared with IMRT, the 2-D conventional radiotherapy irradiated a greater high-dose volume in the oral cavity.
</description><dc:title>Effect of beam arrangement on oral cavity dose in external beam radiotherapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma</dc:title><dc:creator>Vincent W.C. Wu, Zhi-Ning Yang, Wu-Zhe Zhang, Li-li Wu, Zhi-xiong Lin</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.meddos.2011.02.003</dc:identifier><dc:source>Medical Dosimetry 37, 2 (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-05-06</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Medical Dosimetry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-05-06</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>37</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0958-3947(11)X0007-9</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>122</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>126</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394711000793/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Addition of a third field significantly increases dose to the brachial plexus for patients undergoing tangential whole-breast therapy after lumpectomy</title><link>http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394711000793/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: 
Our goal was to evaluate brachial plexus (BP) dose with and without the use of supraclavicular (SCL) irradiation in patients undergoing breast-conserving therapy with whole-breast radiation therapy (RT) after lumpectomy. Using the standardized Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG)–endorsed guidelines delineation, we contoured the BP for 10 postlumpectomy breast cancer patients. The radiation dose to the whole breast was 50.4 Gy using tangential fields in 1.8-Gy fractions, followed by a conedown to the operative bed using electrons (10 Gy). The prescription dose to the SCL field was 50.4 Gy, delivered to 3-cm depth. The mean BP volume was 14.5 ± 1.5 cm3. With tangential fields alone, the median mean dose to the BP was 0.57 Gy, the median maximum dose was 1.93 Gy, and the irradiated volume of the BP receiving 40, 45, and 50 Gy was 0%. When the third (SCL field) was added, the dose to the BP was significantly increased (P = .01): the median mean dose to the BP was 40.60 Gy, and the median maximum dose was 52.22 Gy. With 3-field RT, the median irradiated volume of the BP receiving 40, 45, and 50 Gy was 83.5%, 68.5%, and 24.6%, respectively. The addition of the SCL field significantly increases dose to the BP. The possibility of increasing the risk of BP morbidity should be considered in the context of clinical decision making.
</description><dc:title>Addition of a third field significantly increases dose to the brachial plexus for patients undergoing tangential whole-breast therapy after lumpectomy</dc:title><dc:creator>Sinisa Stanic, Mathew Mathai, Jyoti S. Mayadev, Ly V. Do, James A. Purdy, Allen M. Chen</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.meddos.2011.03.001</dc:identifier><dc:source>Medical Dosimetry 37, 2 (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-09-26</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Medical Dosimetry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-09-26</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>37</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0958-3947(11)X0007-9</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>127</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>130</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS095839471100080X/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Simplified field-in-field technique for a large-scale implementation in breast radiation treatment</title><link>http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS095839471100080X/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: 
We wanted to evaluate a simplified “field-in-field” technique (SFF) that was implemented in our department of Radiation Oncology for breast treatment. This study evaluated 15 consecutive patients treated with a simplified field in field technique after breast-conserving surgery for early-stage breast cancer. Radiotherapy consisted of whole-breast irradiation to the total dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions, and a boost of 16 Gy in 8 fractions to the tumor bed. We compared dosimetric outcomes of SFF to state-of-the-art electronic surface compensation (ESC) with dynamic leaves. An analysis of early skin toxicity of a population of 15 patients was performed. The median volume receiving at least 95% of the prescribed dose was 763 mL (range, 347–1472) for SFF vs. 779 mL (range, 349–1494) for ESC. The median residual 107% isodose was 0.1 mL (range, 0–63) for SFF and 1.9 mL (range, 0–57) for ESC. Monitor units were on average 25% higher in ESC plans compared with SFF. No patient treated with SFF had acute side effects superior to grade 1-NCI scale. SFF created homogenous 3D dose distributions equivalent to electronic surface compensation with dynamic leaves. It allowed the integration of a forward planned concomitant tumor bed boost as an additional multileaf collimator subfield of the tangential fields. Compared with electronic surface compensation with dynamic leaves, shorter treatment times allowed better radiation protection to the patient. Low-grade acute toxicity evaluated weekly during treatment and 2 months after treatment completion justified the pursuit of this technique for all breast patients in our department.
</description><dc:title>Simplified field-in-field technique for a large-scale implementation in breast radiation treatment</dc:title><dc:creator>Nathalie Fournier-Bidoz, Youlia M. Kirova, Francois Campana, Rémi Dendale, Alain Fourquet</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.meddos.2011.03.002</dc:identifier><dc:source>Medical Dosimetry 37, 2 (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-09-26</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Medical Dosimetry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-09-26</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>37</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0958-3947(11)X0007-9</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>131</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>137</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394711001099/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Effect of processor temperature on film dosimetry</title><link>http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394711001099/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: 
Optical density (OD) of a radiographic film plays an important role in radiation dosimetry, which depends on various parameters, including beam energy, depth, field size, film batch, dose, dose rate, air film interface, postexposure processing time, and temperature of the processor. Most of these parameters have been studied for Kodak XV and extended dose range (EDR) films used in radiation oncology. There is very limited information on processor temperature, which is investigated in this study. Multiple XV and EDR films were exposed in the reference condition (dmax., 10 × 10 cm2, 100 cm) to a given dose. An automatic film processor (X-Omat 5000) was used for processing films. The temperature of the processor was adjusted manually with increasing temperature. At each temperature, a set of films was processed to evaluate OD at a given dose. For both films, OD is a linear function of processor temperature in the range of 29.4–40.6°C (85–105°F) for various dose ranges. The changes in processor temperature are directly related to the dose by a quadratic function. A simple linear equation is provided for the changes in OD vs. processor temperature, which could be used for correcting dose in radiation dosimetry when film is used.
</description><dc:title>Effect of processor temperature on film dosimetry</dc:title><dc:creator>Shiv P. Srivastava, Indra J. Das</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.meddos.2011.06.001</dc:identifier><dc:source>Medical Dosimetry 37, 2 (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-09-19</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Medical Dosimetry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-09-19</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>37</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0958-3947(11)X0007-9</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>138</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>139</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394711001105/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Bowel sparing in pediatric cranio-spinal radiotherapy: a comparison of combined electron and photon and helical TomoTherapy techniques to a standard photon method</title><link>http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394711001105/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: 
The aim of this study was to compare the dose to organs at risk (OARs) from different craniospinal radiotherapy treatment approaches available at the Northern Centre for Cancer Care (NCCC), with a particular emphasis on sparing the bowel. Method: Treatment plans were produced for a pediatric medulloblastoma patient with inflammatory bowel disease using 3D conformal 6-MV photons (3DCP), combined 3D 6-MV photons and 18-MeV electrons (3DPE), and helical photon TomoTherapy (HT). The 3DPE plan was a modification of the standard 3DCP technique, using electrons to treat the spine inferior to the level of the diaphragm. The plans were compared in terms of the dose-volume data to OARs and the nontumor integral dose. Results: The 3DPE plan was found to give the lowest dose to the bowel and the lowest nontumor integral dose of the 3 techniques. However, the coverage of the spine planning target volume (PTV) was least homogeneous using this technique, with only 74.6% of the PTV covered by 95% of the prescribed dose. HT was able to achieve the best coverage of the PTVs (99.0% of the whole-brain PTV and 93.1% of the spine PTV received 95% of the prescribed dose), but delivered a significantly higher integral dose. HT was able to spare the heart, thyroid, and eyes better than the linac-based techniques, but other OARs received a higher dose. Conclusions: Use of electrons was the best method for reducing the dose to the bowel and the integral dose, at the expense of compromised spine PTV coverage. For some patients, HT may be a viable method of improving dose homogeneity and reducing selected OAR doses.
</description><dc:title>Bowel sparing in pediatric cranio-spinal radiotherapy: a comparison of combined electron and photon and helical TomoTherapy techniques to a standard photon method</dc:title><dc:creator>Elizabeth Harron, Joanne Lewis</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.meddos.2011.06.002</dc:identifier><dc:source>Medical Dosimetry 37, 2 (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-09-26</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Medical Dosimetry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-09-26</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>37</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0958-3947(11)X0007-9</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>140</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>144</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394711001117/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Improvement of Varian a-Si EPID dosimetry measurements using a lead-shielded support-arm</title><link>http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394711001117/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: 
Dosimetry measurements with Varian amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging devices (a-Si EPIDs) are affected by the backscattered radiation from the EPID support arm. In this study, the nonuniform backscatter from an E-type support arm was reduced by fixing a thick (12.2 × 10.5 × 0.5 cm3) piece of lead on top of the arm, and the remaining backscatter was modeled and included in an existing dose prediction algorithm. The applied backscatter kernel was the average of kernels on different regions of the EPID over the arm. The lead-shielded arm reduced the nonuniform backscatter component by about 50% for field sizes ranging from 3 × 3 to 30 × 30 cm2 and the field symmetry improved for medium to large fields up to 3%. Gamma evaluation of the measured and modeled doses (2%, 2-mm criteria) showed that using the lead-shielded arm in the model increased the number of points with Gamma index &lt;1 by 5.7% and decreased the mean Gamma by 0.201. Even using the lead alone (no modeling) could increase the number of points with Gamma index &lt;1 by 4.7% and decrease the mean Gamma by 0.153. This is a simple and easy method to decrease the nonuniform arm backscatter and improve the accuracy of dosimetry measurements with the existing EPIDs used for clinical applications.
</description><dc:title>Improvement of Varian a-Si EPID dosimetry measurements using a lead-shielded support-arm</dc:title><dc:creator>Pejman Rowshanfarzad, Mahsheed Sabet, Daryl J. O'Connor, Peter B. Greer</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.meddos.2011.06.003</dc:identifier><dc:source>Medical Dosimetry 37, 2 (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-09-19</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Medical Dosimetry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-09-19</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>37</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0958-3947(11)X0007-9</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>145</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>151</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394711001129/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Correlation of dosimetric parameters obtained with the analytical anisotropic algorithm and toxicity of chest chemoradiation in lung carcinoma</title><link>http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394711001129/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: 
The purpose of this study was to analyze and revisit toxicity related to chest chemoradiotherapy and to correlate these side effects with dosimetric parameters obtained using analytical anisotropic algorithm (AAA) in locally unresectable advanced lung cancer. We retrospectively analyzed data from 47 lung cancer patients between 2005 and 2008. All received conformal 3D radiotherapy using high-energy linear accelerator plus concomitant chemotherapy. All treatment planning data were transferred into Eclipse 8.05 (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) and dosimetric calculations were performed using AAA. Thirty-three patients (70.2%) developed acute pneumopathy after radiotherapy (grades 1 and 2). One patient (2.1%) presented with grade 3 pneumopathy. Thirty-one (66%) presented with grades 1–2 lung fibrosis, and 1 patient presented with grade 3 lung fibrosis. Thirty-four patients (72.3%) developed grade 1–2 acute oesophagic toxicity. Four patients (8.5%) presented with grades 3 and 4 dysphagia, necessitating prolonged parenteral nutrition. Median prescribed dose was 64 Gy (range 50–74) with conventional fractionation (2 Gy per fraction). Dose–volume constraints were respected with a median V20 of 23.5% (maximum 34%) and a median V30 of 17% (maximum 25%). The median dose delivered to healthy contralateral lung was 13.1 Gy (maximum 18.1 Gy). At univariate analysis, larger planning target volume and V20 were significantly associated with the probability of grade ≥2 radiation-induced pneumopathy (p = 0.022 and p = 0.017, respectively). No relation between oesophagic toxicity and clinical/dosimetric parameters could be established. Using AAA, the present results confirm the predictive value of the V20 for lung toxicity as already demonstrated with the conventional pencil beam convolution approach.
</description><dc:title>Correlation of dosimetric parameters obtained with the analytical anisotropic algorithm and toxicity of chest chemoradiation in lung carcinoma</dc:title><dc:creator>Lysian Cartier, Pierre Auberdiac, Mustapha Khodri, Nadia Malkoun, Cyrus Chargari, Julie Thorin, Adrien Mélis, Jean-Noël Talabard, Guy de Laroche, Pierre Fournel, Olivier Tiffet, Thierry Schmitt, Nicolas Magné</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.meddos.2011.06.004</dc:identifier><dc:source>Medical Dosimetry 37, 2 (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-09-19</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Medical Dosimetry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-09-19</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>37</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0958-3947(11)X0007-9</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>152</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>156</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394711001130/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Adaptive planning using megavoltage fan-beam CT for radiation therapy with testicular shielding</title><link>http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394711001130/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: 
This study highlights the use of adaptive planning to accommodate testicular shielding in helical tomotherapy for malignancies of the proximal thigh. Two cases of young men with large soft tissue sarcomas of the proximal thigh are presented. After multidisciplinary evaluation, preoperative radiation therapy was recommended. Both patients were referred for sperm banking and lead shields were used to minimize testicular dose during radiation therapy. To minimize imaging artifacts, kilovoltage CT (kVCT) treatment planning was conducted without shielding. Generous hypothetical contours were generated on each “planning scan” to estimate the location of the lead shield and generate a directionally blocked helical tomotherapy plan. To ensure the accuracy of each plan, megavoltage fan-beam CT (MVCT) scans were obtained at the first treatment and adaptive planning was performed to account for lead shield placement. Two important regions of interest in these cases were femurs and femoral heads. During adaptive planning for the first patient, it was observed that the virtual lead shield contour on kVCT planning images was significantly larger than the actual lead shield used for treatment. However, for the second patient, it was noted that the size of the virtual lead shield contoured on the kVCT image was significantly smaller than the actual shield size. Thus, new adaptive plans based on MVCT images were generated and used for treatment. The planning target volume was underdosed up to 2% and had higher maximum doses without adaptive planning. In conclusion, the treatment of the upper thigh, particularly in young men, presents several clinical challenges, including preservation of gonadal function. In such circumstances, adaptive planning using MVCT can ensure accurate dose delivery even in the presence of high-density testicular shields.
</description><dc:title>Adaptive planning using megavoltage fan-beam CT for radiation therapy with testicular shielding</dc:title><dc:creator>Poonam Yadav, Kevin Kozak, Ranjini Tolakanahalli, V. Ramasubramanian, Bhudatt R. Paliwal, James S. Welsh, Yi Rong</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.meddos.2011.06.005</dc:identifier><dc:source>Medical Dosimetry 37, 2 (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-09-19</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Medical Dosimetry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-09-19</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>37</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0958-3947(11)X0007-9</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>157</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>162</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394711001142/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Can radiation therapy treatment planning system accurately predict surface doses in postmastectomy radiation therapy patients?</title><link>http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394711001142/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: 
Skin doses have been an important factor in the dose prescription for breast radiotherapy. Recent advances in radiotherapy treatment techniques, such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and new treatment schemes such as hypofractionated breast therapy have made the precise determination of the surface dose necessary. Detailed information of the dose at various depths of the skin is also critical in designing new treatment strategies. The purpose of this work was to assess the accuracy of surface dose calculation by a clinically used treatment planning system and those measured by thermoluminescence dosimeters (TLDs) in a customized chest wall phantom. This study involved the construction of a chest wall phantom for skin dose assessment. Seven TLDs were distributed throughout each right chest wall phantom to give adequate representation of measured radiation doses. Point doses from the CMS Xio® treatment planning system (TPS) were calculated for each relevant TLD positions and results correlated. There were no significant difference between measured absorbed dose by TLD and calculated doses by the TPS (p &gt; 0.05 (1-tailed). Dose accuracy of up to 2.21% was found. The deviations from the calculated absorbed doses were overall larger (3.4%) when wedges and bolus were used. 3D radiotherapy TPS is a useful and accurate tool to assess the accuracy of surface dose. Our studies have shown that radiation treatment accuracy expressed as a comparison between calculated doses (by TPS) and measured doses (by TLD dosimetry) can be accurately predicted for tangential treatment of the chest wall after mastectomy.
</description><dc:title>Can radiation therapy treatment planning system accurately predict surface doses in postmastectomy radiation therapy patients?</dc:title><dc:creator>Sharon Wong, Michael Back, Poh Wee Tan, Khai Mun Lee, Shaun Baggarley, Jaide Jay Lu</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.meddos.2011.06.006</dc:identifier><dc:source>Medical Dosimetry 37, 2 (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-08-25</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Medical Dosimetry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-08-25</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>37</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0958-3947(11)X0007-9</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>163</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>169</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394711001154/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Measuring pacemaker dose: A clinical perspective</title><link>http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394711001154/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: 
Recently in our clinic, we have seen an increased number of patients presenting with pacemakers and defibrillators. Precautions are taken to develop a treatment plan that minimizes the dose to the pacemaker because of the adverse effects of radiation on the electronics. Here we analyze different dosimeters to determine which is the most accurate in measuring pacemaker or defibrillator dose while at the same time not requiring a significant investment in time to maintain an efficient workflow in the clinic. The dosimeters analyzed here were ion chambers, diodes, metal-oxide-semiconductor field effect transistor (MOSFETs), and optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimeters. A simple phantom was used to quantify the angular and energy dependence of each dosimeter. Next, 8 patients plans were delivered to a Rando phantom with all the dosimeters located where the pacemaker would be, and the measurements were compared with the predicted dose. A cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) image was obtained to determine the dosimeter response in the kilovoltage energy range. In terms of the angular and energy dependence of the dosimeters, the ion chamber and diode were the most stable. For the clinical cases, all the dosimeters match relatively well with the predicted dose, although the ideal dosimeter to use is case dependent. The dosimeters, especially the MOSFETS, tend to be less accurate for the plans, with many lateral beams. Because of their efficiency, we recommend using a MOSFET or a diode to measure the dose. If a discrepancy is observed between the measured and expected dose (especially when the pacemaker to field edge is &lt;10 cm), we recommend analyzing the treatment plan to see whether there are many lateral beams. Follow-up with another dosimeter rather than repeating multiple times with the same type of dosimeter. All dosimeters should be placed after the CBCT has been acquired.
</description><dc:title>Measuring pacemaker dose: A clinical perspective</dc:title><dc:creator>Matthew T. Studenski, Ying Xiao, Amy S. Harrison</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.meddos.2011.06.007</dc:identifier><dc:source>Medical Dosimetry 37, 2 (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-08-29</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Medical Dosimetry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-08-29</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>37</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0958-3947(11)X0007-9</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>170</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>174</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394711001166/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Total dural irradiation: RapidArc versus static-field IMRT: A case study</title><link>http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394711001166/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: 
The purpose of this study was to compare conventional fixed-gantry angle intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with RapidArc for total dural irradiation. We also hypothesize that target volume–individualized collimator angles may produce substantial normal tissue sparing when planning with RapidArc. Five-, 7-, and 9-field fixed-gantry angle sliding-window IMRT plans were generated for comparison with RapidArc plans. Optimization and normal tissue constraints were constant for all plans. All plans were normalized so that 95% of the planning target volume (PTV) received at least 100% of the dose. RapidArc was delivered using 350° clockwise and counterclockwise arcs. Conventional collimator angles of 45° and 315° were compared with 90° on both arcs. Dose prescription was 59.4 Gy in 33 fractions. PTV metrics used for comparison were coverage, V107%, D1%, conformality index (CI95%), and heterogeneity index (D5%–D95%). Brain dose, the main challenge of this case, was compared using D1%, Dmean, and V5 Gy. Dose to optic chiasm, optic nerves, globes, and lenses was also compared. The use of unconventional collimator angles (90° on both arcs) substantially reduced dose to normal brain. All plans achieved acceptable target coverage. Homogeneity was similar for RapidArc and 9-field IMRT plans. However, heterogeneity increased with decreasing number of IMRT fields, resulting in unacceptable hotspots within the brain. Conformality was marginally better with RapidArc relative to IMRT. Low dose to brain, as indicated by V5Gy, was comparable in all plans. Doses to organs at risk (OARs) showed no clinically meaningful differences. The number of monitor units was lower and delivery time was reduced with RapidArc. The case-individualized RapidArc plan compared favorably with the 9-field conventional IMRT plan. In view of lower monitor unit requirements and shorter delivery time, RapidArc was selected as the optimal solution. Individualized collimator angle solutions should be considered by RapidArc dosimetrists for OARs dose reduction. RapidArc should be considered as a treatment modality for tumors that extensively involve in the skull, dura, or scalp.
</description><dc:title>Total dural irradiation: RapidArc versus static-field IMRT: A case study</dc:title><dc:creator>Paul J. Kelly, Edward Mannarino, John Henry Lewis, Elizabeth H. Baldini, Fred L. Hacker</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.meddos.2011.06.008</dc:identifier><dc:source>Medical Dosimetry 37, 2 (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-08-22</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Medical Dosimetry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-08-22</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>37</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0958-3947(11)X0007-9</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>175</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>181</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394711001178/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Quantification of incidental mediastinal and hilar irradiation delivered during definitive stereotactic body radiation therapy for peripheral non–small cell lung cancer</title><link>http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394711001178/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: 
To determine the amount of incidental radiation dose received by the mediastinal and hilar nodes for patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Fifty consecutive patients with NSCLC, treated using an SBRT technique, were identified. Of these patients, 38 had a prescription dose of 60 Gy in 20-Gy fractions and were eligible for analysis. For each patient, ipsilateral upper (level 2) and lower (level 4) paratracheal, and hilar (level 10) nodal regions were contoured on the planning computed tomography (CT) images. Using the clinical treatment plan, dose and volume calculations were performed retrospectively for each nodal region. SBRT to upper lobe tumors resulted in an average total ipsilateral mean dose of between 5.2 and 7.8 Gy for the most proximal paratracheal nodal stations (2R and 4R for right upper lobe lesions, 2L and 4L for left upper lobe lesions). SBRT to lower lobe tumors resulted in an average total ipsilateral mean dose of between 15.6 and 21.5 Gy for the most proximal hilar nodal stations (10R for right lower lobe lesions, 10 l for left lower lobe lesions). Doses to more distal nodes were substantially lower than 5 Gy. The often substantial incidental irradiation, delivered during SBRT for peripheral NSCLC of the lower lobes to the most proximal hilar lymph nodes may be therapeutic for low-volume, subclinical nodal disease. Treatment of peripheral upper lobe lung tumors delivers less incidental irradiation to the paratracheal lymph nodes with lower likelihood of therapeutic benefit.
</description><dc:title>Quantification of incidental mediastinal and hilar irradiation delivered during definitive stereotactic body radiation therapy for peripheral non–small cell lung cancer</dc:title><dc:creator>Kate L. Martin, Jorge Gomez, Daryl P. Nazareth, Graham W. Warren, Anurag K. Singh</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.meddos.2011.06.009</dc:identifier><dc:source>Medical Dosimetry 37, 2 (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-10-07</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Medical Dosimetry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-10-07</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>37</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0958-3947(11)X0007-9</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>182</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>185</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS095839471100149X/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Whole-breast irradiation: a subgroup analysis of criteria to stratify for prone position treatment</title><link>http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS095839471100149X/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: 
To select among breast cancer patients and according to breast volume size those who may benefit from 3D conformal radiotherapy after conservative surgery applied with prone-position technique. Thirty-eight patients with early-stage breast cancer were grouped according to the target volume (TV) measured in the supine position: small (≤400 mL), medium (400–700 mL), and large (≥700 ml). An ad-hoc designed and built device was used for prone set-up to displace the contralateral breast away from the tangential field borders. All patients underwent treatment planning computed tomography in both the supine and prone positions. Dosimetric data to explore dose distribution and volume of normal tissue irradiated were calculated for each patient in both positions. Homogeneity index, hot spot areas, the maximum dose, and the lung constraints were significantly reduced in the prone position (p &lt; 0.05). The maximum heart distance and the V5Gy did not vary consistently in the 2 positions (p = 0.06 and p = 0.7, respectively). The number of necessary monitor units was significantly higher in the supine position (312 vs. 232, p &lt; 0.0001). The subgroups analysis pointed out the advantage in lung sparing in all TV groups (small, medium and large) for all the evaluated dosimetric constraints (central lung distance, maximum lung distance, and V5Gy, p &lt; 0.0001). In the small TV group, a dose reduction in nontarget areas of 22% in the prone position was detected (p = 0.056); in the medium and high TV groups, the difference was of about −10% (p = NS). The decrease in hot spot areas in nontarget tissues was 73%, 47%, and 80% for small, medium, and large TVs in the prone position, respectively. Although prone breast radiotherapy is normally proposed in patients with breasts of large dimensions, this study gives evidence of dosimetric benefit in all patient subgroups irrespective of breast volume size.
</description><dc:title>Whole-breast irradiation: a subgroup analysis of criteria to stratify for prone position treatment</dc:title><dc:creator>Sara Ramella, Lucio Trodella, Edy Ippolito, Michele Fiore, Francesco Cellini, Gerardina Stimato, Diego Gaudino, Carlo Greco, Sara Ramponi, Eugenio Cammilluzzi, Claudio Cesarini, Angelo Piermattei, Alfredo Cesario, Rolando Maria D'Angelillo</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.meddos.2011.06.010</dc:identifier><dc:source>Medical Dosimetry 37, 2 (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-12-26</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Medical Dosimetry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-12-26</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>37</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0958-3947(11)X0007-9</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>186</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>191</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394711001506/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Case study thoracic radiotherapy in an elderly patient with pacemaker: The issue of pacing leads</title><link>http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394711001506/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: 
To assess clinical outcome of patients with pacemaker treated with thoracic radiation therapy for T8-T9 paravertebral chloroma. A 92-year-old male patient with chloroma presenting as paravertebral painful and compressive (T8-T9) mass was referred for radiotherapy in the Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie. The patient presented with cardiac dysfunction and a permanent pacemaker that had been implanted prior. The decision of Multidisciplinary Meeting was to deliver 30 Gy in 10 fractions for reducing the symptoms and controlling the tumor growth. The patient received a total dose of 30 Gy in 10 fractions using 4-field conformal radiotherapy with 20-MV photons. The dose to pacemaker was 0.1 Gy but a part of the pacing leads was in the irradiation fields. The patient was treated the first time in the presence of his radiation oncologist and an intensive care unit doctor. Moreover, the function of his pacemaker was monitored during the entire radiotherapy course. No change in pacemaker function was observed during any of the radiotherapy fractions. The radiotherapy was very well tolerated without any side effects. The function of the pacemaker was checked before and after the radiotherapy treatment by the cardiologist and no pacemaker dysfunction was observed. Although updated guidelines are needed with acceptable dose criteria for implantable cardiac devices, it is possible to treat patients with these devices and parts encroaching on the radiation field. This case report shows we were able to safely treat our patient through a multidisciplinary approach, monitoring the patient during each step of the treatment.
</description><dc:title>Case study thoracic radiotherapy in an elderly patient with pacemaker: The issue of pacing leads</dc:title><dc:creator>Youlia M. Kirova, Jean Menard, Cyrus Chargari, Alejandro Mazal, Krassen Kirov</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.meddos.2011.07.001</dc:identifier><dc:source>Medical Dosimetry 37, 2 (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-01-03</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Medical Dosimetry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-01-03</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>37</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0958-3947(11)X0007-9</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>192</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>194</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394711001543/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Dependences of mucosal dose on photon beams in head-and-neck intensity-modulated radiation therapy: a Monte Carlo study</title><link>http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394711001543/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: 
Dependences of mucosal dose in the oral or nasal cavity on the beam energy, beam angle, multibeam configuration, and mucosal thickness were studied for small photon fields using Monte Carlo simulations (EGSnrc-based code), which were validated by measurements. Cylindrical mucosa phantoms (mucosal thickness = 1, 2, and 3 mm) with and without the bone and air inhomogeneities were irradiated by the 6- and 18-MV photon beams (field size = 1 × 1 cm2) with gantry angles equal to 0°, 90°, and 180°, and multibeam configurations using 2, 4, and 8 photon beams in different orientations around the phantom. Doses along the central beam axis in the mucosal tissue were calculated. The mucosal surface doses were found to decrease slightly (1% for the 6-MV photon beam and 3% for the 18-MV beam) with an increase of mucosal thickness from 1–3 mm, when the beam angle is 0°. The variation of mucosal surface dose with its thickness became insignificant when the beam angle was changed to 180°, but the dose at the bone-mucosa interface was found to increase (28% for the 6-MV photon beam and 20% for the 18-MV beam) with the mucosal thickness. For different multibeam configurations, the dependence of mucosal dose on its thickness became insignificant when the number of photon beams around the mucosal tissue was increased. The mucosal dose with bone was varied with the beam energy, beam angle, multibeam configuration and mucosal thickness for a small segmental photon field. These dosimetric variations are important to consider improving the treatment strategy, so the mucosal complications in head-and-neck intensity-modulated radiation therapy can be minimized.
</description><dc:title>Dependences of mucosal dose on photon beams in head-and-neck intensity-modulated radiation therapy: a Monte Carlo study</dc:title><dc:creator>James C.L. Chow, Amir M. Owrangi</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.meddos.2011.07.002</dc:identifier><dc:source>Medical Dosimetry 37, 2 (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-10-12</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Medical Dosimetry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-10-12</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>37</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0958-3947(11)X0007-9</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>195</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>200</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394711001555/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Characterization of differences in calculated and actual measured skin doses to canine limbs during stereotactic radiosurgery using Gafchromic film</title><link>http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394711001555/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: 
Accurate calculation of absorbed dose to the skin, especially the superficial and radiosensitive basal cell layer, is difficult for many reasons including, but not limited to, the build-up effect of megavoltage photons, tangential beam effects, mixed energy scatter from support devices, and dose interpolation caused by a finite resolution calculation matrix. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has been developed as an alternative limb salvage treatment option at Colorado State University Veterinary Teaching Hospital for dogs with extremity bone tumors. Optimal dose delivery to the tumor during SBRT treatment can be limited by uncertainty in skin dose calculation. The aim of this study was to characterize the difference between measured and calculated radiation dose by the Varian Eclipse (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) AAA treatment planning algorithm (for 1-mm, 2-mm, and 5-mm calculation voxel dimensions) as a function of distance from the skin surface. The study used Gafchromic EBT film (International Specialty Products, Wayne, NJ), FilmQA analysis software, a limb phantom constructed from plastic water™ (fluke Biomedical, Everett, WA) and a canine cadaver forelimb. The limb phantom was exposed to 6-MV treatments consisting of a single-beam, a pair of parallel opposed beams, and a 7-beam coplanar treatment plan. The canine forelimb was exposed to the 7-beam coplanar plan. Radiation dose to the forelimb skin at the surface and at depths of 1.65 mm and 1.35 mm below the skin surface were also measured with the Gafchromic film. The calculation algorithm estimated the dose well at depths beyond buildup for all calculation voxel sizes. The calculation algorithm underestimated the dose in portions of the buildup region of tissue for all comparisons, with the most significant differences observed in the 5-mm calculation voxel and the least difference in the 1-mm voxel. Results indicate a significant difference between measured and calculated data extending to average depths of 2.5 mm, 3.4 mm, and 10 mm for the 1-mm, 2-mm, and 5-mm dimension calculation matrices, respectively. These results emphasize the importance of selecting as small a treatment planning software calculation matrix dimension as is practically possible and of taking a conservative approach for skin treatment planning objectives. One suggested conservative approach is accomplished by defining the skin organ as the outermost 2–3 mm of the body such that the high dose tail of the skin organ dose-volume histogram curve represents dose on the deep side of the skin where the algorithm is more accurate.
</description><dc:title>Characterization of differences in calculated and actual measured skin doses to canine limbs during stereotactic radiosurgery using Gafchromic film</dc:title><dc:creator>Jerri Walters, Stewart Ryan, Joseph F. Harmon</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.meddos.2011.07.003</dc:identifier><dc:source>Medical Dosimetry 37, 2 (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-10-10</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Medical Dosimetry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-10-10</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>37</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0958-3947(11)X0007-9</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>201</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>207</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394711001567/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Bolus electron conformal therapy for the treatment of recurrent inflammatory breast cancer: a case report</title><link>http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394711001567/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: 
The treatment of locoregionally recurrent breast cancer in patients who have previously undergone radiation therapy is challenging. Special techniques are often required that both eradicate the disease and minimize the risks of retreatment. We report the case of a patient with an early-stage left breast cancer who developed inflammatory-type recurrence requiring re-irradiation of the chest wall using bolus electron conformal therapy with image-guided treatment delivery. The patient was a 51-year-old woman who had undergone lumpectomy, axillary lymph node dissection, and adjuvant whole-breast radiation therapy for a stage I left breast cancer in June 1998. In March 2009, she presented at our institution with biopsy-proven recurrent inflammatory carcinoma and was aggressively treated with multi-agent chemotherapy followed by mastectomy that left a positive surgical margin. Given the patient's prior irradiation and irregular chest wall anatomy, bolus electron conformal therapy was used to treat her chest wall and draining lymphatics while sparing the underlying soft tissue. The patient still had no evidence of disease 21 months after treatment. Our results indicate that bolus electron conformal therapy is an accessible, effective radiation treatment approach for recurrent breast cancer in patients with irregular chest wall anatomy as a result of surgery. This approach may complement standard techniques used to reduce locoregional recurrence in the postmastectomy setting.
</description><dc:title>Bolus electron conformal therapy for the treatment of recurrent inflammatory breast cancer: a case report</dc:title><dc:creator>Michelle M. Kim, Rajat J. Kudchadker, James E. Kanke, Sean Zhang, George H. Perkins</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.meddos.2011.07.004</dc:identifier><dc:source>Medical Dosimetry 37, 2 (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-10-07</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Medical Dosimetry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-10-07</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>37</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0958-3947(11)X0007-9</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>208</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>213</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394711001579/abstract?rss=yes"><title>A case report on bilateral partial breast irradiation using SAVI</title><link>http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394711001579/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: 
To assess dosimetric parameters in a case study where bilateral accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) is delivered using a strut-adjusted volume implant (SAVI) device. A 59-year-old female received APBI in both breasts over 5 days, with fractions of 3.4 Gy twice daily. A Vac-lok system was used for immobilization, and a C-arm was used for daily imaging. We generated dose-volume histograms (DVHs) for the brachytherapy plans to derive several important biologic factors. We calculated the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP), equivalent uniform dose (EUD), and tumor control probability (TCP) using the Lyman-Kutcher-Burman model parameters α = 0.3 Gy−1, α/β = 4 Gy, n = 0.1, and m = 0.3. In addition, we assessed the dose homogeneity index (DHI), overdose index, and dose nonuniformity ratio. D95 was &gt;95% and V150 was &lt;50 mL for both breasts. The DHIs were 0.469 and 0.512 for the left and right breasts, respectively. The EUDs (normalized to 3.4 Gy b.i.d.) were 33.53 and 29.10 Gy. The TCPs were estimated at 99.2% and 99.9%, whereas the NTCP values were 4.2% and 2.57%. In this clinical case, we were able to quantify the dosimetric parameters of an APBI treatment performed with a SAVI device.
</description><dc:title>A case report on bilateral partial breast irradiation using SAVI</dc:title><dc:creator>Aime M. Gloi, Robert Buchanan, Jeff Nuskind, Corrie Zuge, Anndrea Goettler</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.meddos.2011.08.001</dc:identifier><dc:source>Medical Dosimetry 37, 2 (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-12-22</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Medical Dosimetry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-12-22</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>37</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0958-3947(11)X0007-9</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>214</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>220</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394711001580/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Comparison of external beam treatment techniques for T1-2, N0, M0 glottic cancers</title><link>http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394711001580/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: 
The purpose of this study was to compare 4 different external beam radiation therapy treatment techniques for the treatment of T1-2, N0, M0 glottic cancers: traditional lateral beams with wedges (3D), 5-field intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and proton therapy. Treatment plans in each technique were created for 10 patients using consistent planning parameters. The photon treatment plans were optimized using Philips Pinnacle3 v.9 and the IMRT and VMAT plans used the Direct Machine Parameter Optimization algorithm. The proton treatment plans were optimized using Varian Eclipse Proton v.8.9. The prescription used for each plan was 63 Gy in 28 fractions. The contours for spinal cord, right carotid artery, left carotid artery, and normal tissue were created with respect to the patient's bony anatomy so that proper comparisons of doses could be made with respect to volume. An example of the different isodose distributions will be shown. The data collection for comparison purposes includes: clinical treatment volume coverage, dose to spinal cord, dose to carotid arteries, and dose to normal tissue. Data comparisons will be displayed graphically showing the maximum, mean, median, and ranges of doses.
</description><dc:title>Comparison of external beam treatment techniques for T1-2, N0, M0 glottic cancers</dc:title><dc:creator>Pamela Camingue, Rochelle Christian, Davin Ng, Preston Williams, Mayankkumar Amin, Dominique L. Roniger</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.meddos.2011.08.002</dc:identifier><dc:source>Medical Dosimetry 37, 2 (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-02-27</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Medical Dosimetry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-02-27</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>37</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0958-3947(11)X0007-9</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>221</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>224</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394711001592/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Changes of the transverse diameter and volume and dosimetry before the 25th fraction during the course of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma</title><link>http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394711001592/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: 
To quantify changes of the transverse diameter and volume and dosimetry, and to illustrate the inferiority of non-replanning during intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients. Fifty-three NPC patients who received IMRT in 33 fractions were enrolled in this prospective trial. Before the 25th fraction, a new simulation computed tomography (CT) scan was acquired for all patients. The dose-volume histograms of the phantom plan were compared with the initial plan. Significant reduction of the transverse diameter of the nasopharyngeal, the neck, and 2 parotid glands volume was observed on second CT compared with the first CT (mean reduction 7.48 ± 4.45 mm, 6.80 ± 15.14 mm, 5.70 ± 6.26 mL, and 5.04 ± 5.85 mL, respectively; p &lt; 0.01). The maximum dose and V-40 of the spinal cord, mean dose, and V30 of the left and right parotid, and V-50 of the brain stem were increased significantly in the phantom plan compared with the initial plan (mean increase 4.75 ± 5.55 Gy, 7.18 ± 10.07%, 4.51 ± 8.55 Gy, 6.59 ± 17.82%, 5.33 ± 8.55 Gy, 11.68 ± 17.11% and 1.48 ± 3.67%, respectively; p &lt; 0.01). On the basis of dose constraint criterion in the RTOG0225 protocol, the dose of the normal critical structures for 52.83% (28/53) of the phantom plans were out of limit compared with 1.89% (1/53) of the initial plans (p &lt; 0.0001). Because of the significant change in anatomy and dose before the 25th fraction during IMRT, replanning should be necessary during IMRT with NPC.
</description><dc:title>Changes of the transverse diameter and volume and dosimetry before the 25th fraction during the course of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma</dc:title><dc:creator>Haihua Yang, Wei Hu, Weijun Ding, Guoping Shan, Wei Wang, Changhui Yu, Biyun Wang, Minghai Shao, Jianhua Wang, Weifang Yang</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.meddos.2011.08.003</dc:identifier><dc:source>Medical Dosimetry 37, 2 (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-12-22</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Medical Dosimetry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-12-22</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>37</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0958-3947(11)X0007-9</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>225</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>229</prism:endingPage></item></rdf:RDF>
