<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><channel rdf:about="http://www.meddos.org/?rss=yes"><title>Medical Dosimetry</title><description>Medical Dosimetry RSS feed: Current Issue. 
 Medical Dosimetry , the official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists, is the key source of information 
on new developments for the medical dosimetrist. Practical and comprehensive in coverage, the journal features original contributions 
and review articles by medical dosimetrists, oncologists, physicists, and radiation therapy technologists on clinical applications and 
techniques of external beam, interstitial, intracavitary and intraluminal irradiation in cancer management. Articles dealing primarily 
with physics will be reviewed by a specially appointed team of experts in the field. 
 Visit the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists 
Website at:  http://www.medicaldosimetry.org !</description><link>http://www.meddos.org/?rss=yes</link><dc:publisher>Elsevier Inc.</dc:publisher><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:rights> © 2010 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. </dc:rights><prism:publicationName>Medical Dosimetry</prism:publicationName><prism:issn>0958-3947</prism:issn><prism:volume>35</prism:volume><prism:number>3</prism:number><prism:publicationDate>Autumn 2010</prism:publicationDate><prism:copyright> © 2010 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. </prism:copyright><prism:rightsAgent>healthpermissions@elsevier.com</prism:rightsAgent><items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394709000491/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394709000508/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS095839470900051X/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394709000521/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394709000533/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394709000545/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394709000557/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394709000570/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394709000594/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394709000569/abstract?rss=yes"/></rdf:Seq></items></channel><item rdf:about="http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394709000491/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Internal Mammary Lymph Node Irradiation Contributes to Heart Dose in Breast Cancer</title><link>http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394709000491/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: We assessed the impact of internal mammary chain radiotherapy (IMC RT) to the radiation dose received by the heart in terms of heart dose-volume histogram (DVH). Thirty-six consecutive breast cancer patients presenting with indications for IMC RT were enrolled in a prospective study. The IMC was treated by a standard conformal RT technique (50 Gy). For each patient, a cardiac DVH was generated by taking into account the sole contribution of IMC RT. Cardiac HDV were compared according to breast cancer laterality and the type of previous surgical procedure, simple mastectomy or breast conservative therapy (BCT). The contribution of IMC RT to the heart dose was significantly greater for patients with left-sided versus right-sided tumors (13.8% and 12.8% for left-sided tumors versus 3.9% and 4.2% for right-sided tumors in the BCT group and the mastectomy group, respectively; p &lt; 0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference in IMC contribution depending on the initial surgical procedure. IMC RT contributes to cardiac dose for both left-sided and right-sided breast cancers, although the relative contribution is greater in patients with left-sided tumors.</description><dc:title>Internal Mammary Lymph Node Irradiation Contributes to Heart Dose in Breast Cancer</dc:title><dc:creator>Cyrus Chargari, Pierre Castadot, Dhara MacDermed, Christophe Vandekerkhove, Nicolas Bourgois, Paul Van Houtte, Nicolas Magné</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.meddos.2009.05.002</dc:identifier><dc:source>Medical Dosimetry 35, 3 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2009-06-26</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Medical Dosimetry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2009-06-26</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>35</prism:volume><prism:number>3</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0958-3947(10)X0003-6</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>163</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>168</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394709000508/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Beams Arrangement in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) According to PTV and Dosimetric Parameters Predictive of Pneumonitis</title><link>http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394709000508/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: The aim of this study is to propose and validate an original new class of solutions for three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) treatment planning for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) according to the different patterns of disease presentation (on the basis of tumor location and volume) and to explore beams arrangement (planar or no-planar solutions) to respect dose constraints to the lung parenchyma. Benchmarks matched to validate the new approach are interuser reproducibility and saving on planning time. Tumor location was explored and specific categories created according to the tumor volume and location. Therefore, by applying planar and no-planar 3D plans, we searched for an optimization of the beams arrangement for each category. Dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were analyzed and a plan comparison performed. Results were then validated (class solution planning confirmation) by applying the same strategy to another group of patients. This has been realized at two dose levels (50.4 and 59.4 Gy). Fifty-nine patients were enrolled in this dosimetric study. In the first 27 patients (“exploratory sample”) three main planning target volume location categories were identified according to the pattern of the disease presentation: (1) centrally located; (2) peripheral T and mediastinal N (P+N); and (3) superior sulcus. Original class solutions were proposed for each location category. On the next 32 patients (“validation sample”), the treatment planning started directly with the recommended approach. Mean V20Gy value was 18.8% (SD ± 7.25); mean V30Gy:12% (SD ± 4.05); and mean lung dose: 11.6Gy (SD ± 5.77). No differences between the two total dose level groups were observed. These results suggest a simple and reproducible tool for treatment planning in NSCLC, allowing interuser reproducibility and cutting down on planning time.</description><dc:title>Beams Arrangement in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) According to PTV and Dosimetric Parameters Predictive of Pneumonitis</dc:title><dc:creator>Sara Ramella, Lucio Trodella, Tommaso Claudio Mineo, Eugenio Pompeo, Maria A. Gambacorta, Francesco Cellini, Marzia Ciresa, Michele Fiore, Carlo Greco, Diego Gaudino, Gerardina Stimato, Angelo Piermattei, Alfredo Cesario, Rolando M. D'Angelillo</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.meddos.2009.05.003</dc:identifier><dc:source>Medical Dosimetry 35, 3 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2009-06-26</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Medical Dosimetry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2009-06-26</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>35</prism:volume><prism:number>3</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0958-3947(10)X0003-6</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>169</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>178</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS095839470900051X/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Ion Stopping Powers and CT Numbers</title><link>http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS095839470900051X/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: One of the advantages of ion beam therapy is the steep dose gradient produced near the ion's range. Use of this advantage makes knowledge of the stopping powers for all materials through which the beam passes critical. Most treatment planning systems calculate dose distributions using depth dose data measured in water and an algorithm that converts the kilovoltage X-ray computed tomography (CT) number of a given material to its linear stopping power relative to water. Some materials present in kilovoltage scans of patients and simulation phantoms do not lie on the standard tissue conversion curve. The relative linear stopping powers (RLSPs) of 21 different tissue substitutes and positioning, registration, immobilization, and beamline materials were measured in beams of protons accelerated to energies of 155, 200, and 250 MeV; carbon ions accelerated to 290 MeV/n; and iron ions accelerated to 970 MeV/n. These same materials were scanned with both kilovoltage and megavoltage CT scanners to obtain their CT numbers. Measured RLSPs and CT numbers were compared with calculated and/or literature values. Relationships of RLSPs to physical densities, electronic densities, kilovoltage CT numbers, megavoltage CT numbers, and water equivalence values converted by a treatment planning system are given. Usage of CT numbers and substitution of measured values into treatment plans to provide accurate patient and phantom simulations are discussed.</description><dc:title>Ion Stopping Powers and CT Numbers</dc:title><dc:creator>Michael F. Moyers, Milind Sardesai, Sean Sun, Daniel W. Miller</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.meddos.2009.05.004</dc:identifier><dc:source>Medical Dosimetry 35, 3 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2009-09-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Medical Dosimetry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>35</prism:volume><prism:number>3</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0958-3947(10)X0003-6</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>179</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>194</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394709000521/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Dose Calculation on KV Cone Beam CT Images: An Investigation of the Hu-Density Conversion Stability and Dose Accuracy Using the Site-Specific Calibration</title><link>http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394709000521/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Precise calibration of Hounsfield units (HU) to electron density (HU-density) is essential to dose calculation. On-board kV cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging is used predominantly for patients' positioning, but will potentially be used for dose calculation. The impacts of varying 3 imaging parameters (mAs, source-imager distance [SID], and cone angle) and phantom size on the HU number accuracy and HU-density calibrations for CBCT imaging were studied. We proposed a site-specific calibration method to achieve higher accuracy in CBCT image-based dose calculation. Three configurations of the Computerized Imaging Reference Systems (CIRS) water equivalent electron density phantom were used to simulate sites including head, lungs, and lower body (abdomen/pelvis). The planning computed tomography (CT) scan was used as the baseline for comparisons. CBCT scans of these phantom configurations were performed using Varian Trilogy™ system in a precalibrated mode with fixed tube voltage (125 kVp), but varied mAs, SID, and cone angle. An HU-density curve was generated and evaluated for each set of scan parameters. Three HU-density tables generated using different phantom configurations with the same imaging parameter settings were selected for dose calculation on CBCT images for an accuracy comparison. Changing mAs or SID had small impact on HU numbers. For adipose tissue, the HU discrepancy from the baseline was 20 HU in a small phantom, but 5 times lager in a large phantom. Yet, reducing the cone angle significantly decreases the HU discrepancy. The HU-density table was also affected accordingly. By performing dose comparison between CT and CBCT image-based plans, results showed that using the site-specific HU-density tables to calibrate CBCT images of different sites improves the dose accuracy to ∼2%. Our phantom study showed that CBCT imaging can be a feasible option for dose computation in adaptive radiotherapy approach if the site-specific calibration is applied.</description><dc:title>Dose Calculation on KV Cone Beam CT Images: An Investigation of the Hu-Density Conversion Stability and Dose Accuracy Using the Site-Specific Calibration</dc:title><dc:creator>Yi Rong, Jennifer Smilowitz, Dinesh Tewatia, Wolfgang A. Tomé, Bhudatt Paliwal</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.meddos.2009.06.001</dc:identifier><dc:source>Medical Dosimetry 35, 3 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2009-09-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Medical Dosimetry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>35</prism:volume><prism:number>3</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0958-3947(10)X0003-6</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>195</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>207</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394709000533/abstract?rss=yes"><title>SORS: A New Software for the Simulation of Radiotherapy Schedule</title><link>http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394709000533/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: We present a software for choosing the best radiotherapy treatment schedule for head and neck cancers as a beginning radiotherapy plan or a temporarily interrupted plan. Its application occurs according to two modalities: the first adopts the best estimates for model parameters; the second takes into account the parameters' uncertainty too. In both cases, the choice becomes the schedule with the highest uncomplicated tumor control probability (UTCP). In the UTCP valuation, the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of each organ is related to the gravity of its possible late injury. For NTCP calculation, it has been adopted the empirical LKB (Lyman-Kutcher-Burman) model corrected for dose/fraction via linear-quadratic model and the incomplete repair effect. The tumor control probability (TCP) model is Poisson based and contains corrections for dose/fraction and regrowth effect; optionally, it can be accounted for the incomplete repair effect as well. At the end of processing, a detailed file with all informations about UTCP, TCP and single organ NTCP is furnished for every examined schedule. Moreover, a useful 3-D graphic representation of the schedule's UTCP is available, allowing the physician to easily understand the schedules with the highest radiotherapeutic efficacy. The open source characteristic allows the program to adapt to the individual clinical case as well as to be a valid support in radiobiological research.</description><dc:title>SORS: A New Software for the Simulation of Radiotherapy Schedule</dc:title><dc:creator>Pasquale Tamborra, Giovanni Simeone, Enza Carioggia</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.meddos.2009.06.005</dc:identifier><dc:source>Medical Dosimetry 35, 3 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2009-09-04</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Medical Dosimetry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2009-09-04</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>35</prism:volume><prism:number>3</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0958-3947(10)X0003-6</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>208</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>213</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394709000545/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Helical Tomotherapy and Larynx Sparing in Advanced Oropharyngeal Carcinoma: A Dosimetric Study</title><link>http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394709000545/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is gaining acceptance as a standard treatment technique for advanced squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the oropharynx. Dose to the uninvolved larynx and surrounding structures can pose a problem in patients with significant neck disease, potentially compromising laryngeal function and quality of life. Tomotherapy may allow greater laryngeal sparing. Seven patients with stage IV SCC of the oropharynx were replanned using Tomotherapy version 3.1. All contours/planning target volumes (PTVs) from the original plans were preserved, with the exception of the larynx, which was drawn to include all soft tissue encompassed by the thyroid/cricoid cartilage. A simultaneous integrated boost technique was used with PTV 1, 2, and 3 receiving 69.96, 59.40, and 54.00 Gy, respectively in 33 fractions. Dosimetry was evaluated via the Pinnacle treatment planning system (TPS). Equivalent uniform dose (EUD) was calculated from the dose volume histogram (DVH) using the general method with “a” = 5.0. Mean larynx dose for all patients was 24.4 Gy. Mean EUD to the larynx was 34.2 Gy. Homogeneity was adequate; average maximum dose was 109.7% of the highest prescription. All other organs at risk (OAR) were adequately spared. Tomotherapy can spare the uninvolved larynx in the setting of advanced SCC of the oropharynx to levels that are similar to or better than those reported with other techniques. Sparing is achieved without compromising target coverage or other OAR sparing. The clinical benefit of this sparing remains to be determined in a prospective study.</description><dc:title>Helical Tomotherapy and Larynx Sparing in Advanced Oropharyngeal Carcinoma: A Dosimetric Study</dc:title><dc:creator>Benjamin T. Gielda, Cheryl H. Millunchick, Joseph P. Smart, James C. Marsh, Julius V. Turian, Joy L. Coleman</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.meddos.2009.06.002</dc:identifier><dc:source>Medical Dosimetry 35, 3 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2009-09-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Medical Dosimetry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>35</prism:volume><prism:number>3</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0958-3947(10)X0003-6</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>214</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>219</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394709000557/abstract?rss=yes"><title>A Novel Method of Island Blocking in Whole Abdominal Radiotherapy Using a Modified Electronic Tissue Compensation Technique</title><link>http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394709000557/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Traditionally, large fields requiring island blocking used external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) with Cerrobend blocks to limit dose to the critical structures. It is laborious to construct blocks and use them on a daily basis. We present a novel technique for island blocking using a modified electronic tissue compensation (MECOMP) technique. Five patients treated at our institution were selected for this study. The study compared two planning techniques: a novel MECOMP and a conventional EBRT technique. Conventional fields were defined using anterior-posterior and posterior-anterior (PA) fields. The kidneys were contoured and an aperture cut-out block was fitted to the OAR with a 1-cm margin (OARCTV) and placed in the PA field. A dynamic multileaf collimation (DMLC) plan with ECOMP was developed using identical beam and blocking strategy; this tissue compensation–based fluence map was modified to deliver a “zero” dose to the CTVOAR from the PA field. There were no significant differences in the mean, maximum, and minimum doses to the right or left kidney between the two methods. The mean, maximum, and minimum doses to the peritoneal cavity were also not significantly different. The number of monitor units (MUs) required was increased using the MECOMP (273 vs. 1152, p &lt; 0.01). The MECOMP is effectively able to deliver DMLC-based radiotherapy, even with island blocks present. This novel use of MECOMP for whole abdominal radiotherapy should substantially reduce the labor, daily treatment time, and treatment-related errors through the elimination of cerrobend blocks.</description><dc:title>A Novel Method of Island Blocking in Whole Abdominal Radiotherapy Using a Modified Electronic Tissue Compensation Technique</dc:title><dc:creator>Sharad Goyal, Kate Osusky, Molly Gabel, Ning J. Yue, Venkat Narra</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.meddos.2009.06.003</dc:identifier><dc:source>Medical Dosimetry 35, 3 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2009-09-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Medical Dosimetry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>35</prism:volume><prism:number>3</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0958-3947(10)X0003-6</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>220</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>225</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394709000570/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) Treatment Planning for Superficial Tumors</title><link>http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394709000570/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: The physician's planning objective is often a uniform dose distribution throughout the planning target volume (PTV), including superficial PTVs on or near the surface of a patient's body. Varian's Eclipse treatment planning system uses a progressive resolution optimizer (PRO), version 8.2.23, for RapidArc dynamic multileaf collimator volumetric modulated arc therapy planning. Because the PRO is a fast optimizer, optimization convergence errors (OCEs) produce dose nonuniformity in the superficial area of the PTV. We present a postsurgical cranial case demonstrating the recursive method our clinic uses to produce RapidArc treatment plans. The initial RapidArc treatment plan generated using one 360° arc resulted in substantial dose nonuniformity in the superficial section of the PTV. We demonstrate the use of multiple arcs to produce improved dose uniformity in this region. We also compare the results of this superficial dose compensation method to the results of a recursive method of dose correction that we developed in-house to correct optimization convergence errors in static intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment plans. The results show that up to 4 arcs may be necessary to provide uniform dose to the surface of the PTV with the current version of the PRO.</description><dc:title>Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) Treatment Planning for Superficial Tumors</dc:title><dc:creator>Albert S. Zacarias, Mellonie F. Brown, Michael D. Mills</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.meddos.2009.06.006</dc:identifier><dc:source>Medical Dosimetry 35, 3 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2009-08-13</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Medical Dosimetry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2009-08-13</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>35</prism:volume><prism:number>3</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0958-3947(10)X0003-6</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>226</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>229</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394709000594/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Evaluation of Scatter Contribution and Distance Error by Iterative Methods for Strength Determination of HDR 192Ir Brachytherapy Source</title><link>http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394709000594/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: High-dose rate (HDR) 192Ir brachytherapy sources are commonly used for management of malignancies by brachytherapy applications. Measurement of source strength at the hospital is an important dosimetry requirement. The use of 0.6-cm3 cylindrical ionization chamber is one of the methods of measuring the source strength at the hospitals because this chamber is readily available for beam calibration and dosimetry. While using the cylindrical chamber for this purpose, it is also required to determine the positioning error of the ionization chamber, with respect to the source, commonly called a distance error (c). The contribution of scatter radiation (Ms) from floor, walls, ceiling, and other materials available in the treatment room also need to be determined accurately so that appropriate correction can be applied while calculating the source strength from the meter reading. Iterative methods of Newton-Raphson and least-squares were used in this work to determine scatter contribution in the experimentally observed meter reading (pC/s) of a cylindrical ionization chamber. Monte Carlo simulation was also used to cross verify the results of the least-squares method. The experimentally observed, least-squares calculated and Monte Carlo estimated values of meter readings from HDR 192Ir brachytherapy source were in good agreement. Considering procedural simplicity, the method of least-squares is recommended for use at the hospitals to estimate values of f (constant of proportionality), c, and Ms required to determine the strength of HDR 192Ir brachytherapy sources.</description><dc:title>Evaluation of Scatter Contribution and Distance Error by Iterative Methods for Strength Determination of HDR 192Ir Brachytherapy Source</dc:title><dc:creator>Sudhir Kumar, Panchapakesan Srinivasan, Sunil D. Sharma, Kamatam V. Subbaiah, Yelia S. Mayya</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.meddos.2009.06.008</dc:identifier><dc:source>Medical Dosimetry 35, 3 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2009-09-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Medical Dosimetry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>35</prism:volume><prism:number>3</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0958-3947(10)X0003-6</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>230</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>237</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394709000569/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Erratum</title><link>http://www.meddos.org/article/PIIS0958394709000569/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>In our previous publication, the authorship and affiliations were listed incorrectly (page 51). The authorship and affiliations for the article are:   </description><dc:title>Erratum</dc:title><dc:creator>M. Ming Xu, A. Sethi, G.P. Glasgow, John Fan</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.meddos.2009.06.004</dc:identifier><dc:source>Medical Dosimetry 35, 3 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2009-07-30</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Medical Dosimetry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2009-07-30</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>35</prism:volume><prism:number>3</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0958-3947(10)X0003-6</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>238</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>238</prism:endingPage></item></rdf:RDF>