Advertisement

Comparative evaluation of treatment plan quality for a prototype biology-guided radiotherapy system in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Published:November 30, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meddos.2020.11.002

      Abstract

      We aimed to compare prototype treatment plans for a new biology-guided radiotherapy (BgRT) machine in its intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) mode with those using existing IMRT delivery techniques in treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). We retrospectively selected ten previous NPC patients treated in 33 fractions according to the NRG-HN001 treatment protocol. Three treatment plans were generated for each patient: a helical tomotherapy (HT) plan with a 2.5-cm jaw, a volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plan using 2 to 4 6-MV arc fields, and a prototype IMRT plan for a new BgRT system which uses a 6-MV photon beam on a ring gantry that rotates at 60 rotations per minute with a couch that moves in small incremental steps. Treatment plans were compared using dosimetric parameters to planning target volumes (PTVs) and organs at risk (OARs) as specified by the NRG-HN001 protocol. Plans for the three modalities had comparable dose coverage, mean dose, and dose heterogeneity to the primary PTV, while the prototype IMRT plans had greater dose heterogeneity to the non-primary PTVs, with the average homogeneity index ranging from 1.28 to 1.50 in the prototype plans. Six of all the 7 OAR mean dose parameters were lower with statistical significance in the prototype plans compared to the HT and VMAT plans with the other mean dose parameter being comparable, and all the 18 OAR maximum dose parameters were comparable or lower with statistical significance in the prototype plans. The average left and right parotid mean doses in the prototype plans were 10.5 Gy and 10.4 Gy lower than those in the HT plans, respectively, and were 5.1 Gy and 5.2 Gy lower than those in the VMAT plans, respectively. Compared to that with the HT and VMAT plans, the treatment time was longer with statistical significance with the prototype IMRT plans. Based on dosimetric comparison of ten NPC cases, the prototype IMRT plans achieved comparable or better critical organ sparing compared to the HT and VMAT plans for definitive NPC radiotherapy. However, there was higher dose heterogeneity to non-primary targets and longer estimated treatment time with the prototype plans.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Medical Dosimetry
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Siegel RL
        • Miller KD
        • Jemal A
        Cancer statistics, 2019.
        CA Cancer J Clin. 2019; 69: 7-34
        • Jemal A
        • Bray F
        • Center MM
        • et al.
        Global cancer statistics.
        CA Cancer J Clin. 2011; 61: 69-90
        • Salehiniya H
        • Mohammadian M
        • Mohammadian-Hafshejani A
        • et al.
        Nasopharyngeal cancer in the world: epidemiology, incidence, mortality and risk factors.
        World Cancer Res J. 2018; 5: e1046
        • Wei WI
        • Sham JST
        Nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
        Lancet. 2005; 365: 2041-2054
        • Lee AWM
        • Ng WT
        • Chan LLK
        • et al.
        Evolution of treatment for nasopharyngeal cancer – Success and setback in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy era.
        Radiother Oncol. 2014; 110: 377-384
        • Song T
        • Fang M
        • Zhang X
        • et al.
        Sustained improvement of quality of life for nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated by intensity modulated radiation therapy in long-term survivors.
        Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015; 8: 5656-5666
        • Ge X
        • Liao Z
        • Yuan J
        • et al.
        Radiotherapy-related quality of life in patients with head and neck cancers: a meta-analysis.
        Support Care Canc. 2019;
        • Sommat K
        • Hussain A
        • Ong WS
        • et al.
        Clinical and dosimetric predictors of physician and patient reported xerostomia following intensity modulated radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal caner – A prospective cohort analysis.
        Radiother Oncol. 2019; 138: 149-157
        • McDowell LJ
        • Rock K
        • Xu W
        • et al.
        Long-term late toxicity, quality of life, and emotional distress in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018; 102: 340-352
        • Yao J
        • Jin Y
        • Wang S
        • et al.
        The detrimental effects of radiotherapy interruption on local control after concurrent chemoradiotherapy for advanced T-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an observational, prospective analysis.
        BMC Cancer. 2018; 18: 740https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4495-2
        • Yao J
        • Zhang F
        • Gao T
        • et al.
        Survival impact of radiotherapy interruption in nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy era: A Big Data intelligence platform-based analysis.
        Radiother Oncol. 2019; 132: 178-187
        • Fan Q
        • Nanduri A
        • Mazin S
        • et al.
        Emission guided radiation therapy for lung and prostate cancers: a feasibility study on a digital patient.
        Med Phys. 2012; 39: 7140-7152https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4761951
        • Fan Q
        • Nanduri A
        • Yang J
        • et al.
        Toward a planning scheme for emission guided radiation therapy (EGRT): FDG based tumor tracking in a metastatic breast cancer patient.
        Med Phys. 2013; 40081708https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4812427
      1. Clinicaltrials.gov [internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Library of medicine (US). Identifier NCT02135042, Individualized treatment in treating patients with stage II-IVB nasopharyngeal cancer based on EBV DNA. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02135042

        • Kissick MW
        • Fenwick J
        • James JA
        • et al.
        The helical tomotherapy thread effect.
        Med Phys. 2005; 32: 1414-1423
        • Bassalow R
        • Zaks D
        • Maganti S
        • et al.
        Evaluation and validation of a set of dosimetric and geometric accuracy tests of the collapsed cone convolution superposition dose calculation algorithm for the RefleXion treatment planning system.
        Med Phys. 2019; 46: e159
        • Nutting CM
        • Bedford JL
        • Cosgrove VP
        • et al.
        A comparison of conformal and intensity-modulated techniques for oesophageal radiotherapy.
        Radiother Oncol. 2001; 61: 157-163
        • Lee TF
        • Fang FM
        • Chao PJ
        • et al.
        Dosimetric comparisons of helical tomotherapy and step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
        Radiother Oncol. 2008; 89: 89-96https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2008.05.010
        • Fiorino C
        • Dell'Oca I
        • Pierelli A
        • et al.
        Simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) for nasopharynx cancer with helical tomotherapy.
        Strahlenther Oncol. 2007; 183: 497-505https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-007-1698-x
        • Lee FK
        • Yip CW
        • Cheung C
        • et al.
        Dosimetric difference amongst 3 techniques: TomoTherapy, sliding-window intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), and RapidArc radiotherapy in the treatment of late-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).
        Med Dosim. 2014; 39: 44-49
        • Lee TF
        • Ting HM
        • Chao PJ
        • et al.
        Dual arc volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) of nasopharyngeal carcinomas: A simultaneous integrated boost treatment plan comparison with intensity-modulated radiotherapies and single arc VMAT.
        Clin Oncol. 2012; 24: 196-207https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clon.2011.06.006
        • Christianen M
        • Verdonck-de Leeuw IM
        • Doornaert P
        • et al.
        Patterns of long-term swallowing dysfunction after definitive radiotherapy or chemoradiation.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015; 117: 139-144
        • Vergeer MR
        • Doornaert PAH
        • Rietveld DHR
        • et al.
        Intensity-modulated radiotherapy reduces radiation-induced morbidity and improves health-related quality of life: Results of a nonrandomized prospective study using a standardized follow-up program.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009; 74: 1-8
        • Beetz I
        • Steenbakkers RJ
        • Chouvalova O
        • et al.
        The QUANTEC criteria for parotid gland dose and their efficacy to prevent moderate to severe patient-rated xerostomia.
        Acta Oncol. 2014; 53: 597-604
        • Little M
        • Schipper M
        • Feng FY
        • et al.
        Reducing xerostomia after chemo-IMRT for head-and-neck cancer: Beyond sparing the parotid glands.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012; 83: 1007-1014https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.09.004
        • Holliday EB
        • Frank SJ.
        Proton radiation therapy for head and neck cancer: a review of the clinical experience to date.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015; 89: 292-302
        • Blanchard P
        • Gunn GB
        • Lin A
        • et al.
        Proton therapy for head and neck cancers.
        Semin Radiat Oncol. 2017; 28: 53-63
        • Widesott L
        • Pierelli A
        • Fiorino C
        • et al.
        Intensity-modulated proton therapy versus helical tomotherapy in nasopharynx cancer: Planning comparison and NTCP evaluation.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008; 72: 589-596https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.05.065
        • Lewis GD
        • Holliday EB
        • Kocak-Uzel E
        • et al.
        Intensity-modulated proton therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Decreased radiation dose to normal structures and encouraging clinical outcomes.
        Head & Neck. 2016; 38 (E1886-1895)https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.24341
        • Hoogeman MS
        • Nyuttens JJ
        • Levendag PC
        • et al.
        Time dependence of intrafraction patient motion assessed by repeat stereoscopic imaging.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008; 70: 609-618
        • Han C
        • Liang J
        • Neylon J
        • et al.
        Dosimetric evaluation of intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery treatment plans for a prototype biology-guided radiotherapy system.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019; 105: E763-E764
        • Hrinivich WT
        • Phillips R
        • Da Silva AJ
        • et al.
        Online PSMA-PET-guided radiotherapy for oligometastatic prostate cancer.
        Adv Radiat Oncol. 2019;
        • Liang J
        • Liu A
        • Han C
        • et al.
        A dosimetric study to assess the feasibility of prototype treatment planning software for a new biology-guided radiation therapy system.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018; 102: e477