Advertisement

Is adaptive planning necessary for patients with large tumor position displacements observed on daily image guidance during lung SBRT?

      Abstract

      For patients undergoing stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung cancer, their tumor positions may vary due to anatomical changes. This study is to investigate whether adaptive re-planning is necessary for patients with large tumor position displacements observed from daily kV-cone-beam computed tomography (kV-CBCT). We selected 16 fractions from 16 patients with recorded treatment couch shifts greater than 1.5 cm under kV-CBCT guidance. The treatment positions for these patients were manually restored in kV-CBCTs via bone-to-bone alignments (B2B) and tumor-to-tumor alignments (T2T) with corresponding planning CTs. The tumor volumes, including PTVs, ITVs, and GTVs, were transferred from the planning CTs to these kV-CBCTs. With the planned beam configurations and treatment isocenters, kV-CBCTs were imported into the treatment planning system for dose recalculations. To minimize uncertainties of the Hounsfield Unit (HU) in kV-CBCTs, uniformed HU values were assigned to the externals, ITVs, and lungs. The percentage volumes of GTVs, ITVs, and PTVs receiving the prescription dose (VRx) and the dose to the normal structures were analyzed. Seven out of the 16 patients were identified with >5mm tumor position displacements after subtracting the recorded couch shifts from the shifts of B2B alignment. For T2T alignments, 9 out of 16 (56.3%) patients had VRx of PTV <95% (the planning goal) with 91.4% as the lowest, while VRx of the GTV and ITV remained 100% for all 16 patients. For B2B alignments, 14 out of 16 (87.5%) patients have VRx of PTV <95%; 5 patients (31.3%) had VRx of ITV <95%; and 4 patients (25.0%) had VRx of GTV <99%. T2T alignment with 5 mm PTV margin was found superior to B2B alignment, resulting in adequate dose coverage to the ITVs, even for tumors with large positional changes. Adaptive re-planning may not be necessary under these scenarios.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Medical Dosimetry
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      Reference

        • Videtic G.M.M.
        • Donington J.
        • Giuliani M.
        • Heinzerling J.
        • Karas T.Z.
        • Kelsey C.R.
        • Lally B.E.
        • et al.
        Stereotactic body radiation therapy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: Executive Summary of an ASTRO Evidence-Based Guideline.
        Pract. Radiat. Oncol. 2017; 7: 295-301
        • Woody N.M.
        • Stephans K.L.
        • Andrews M.
        • Zhuang T.
        • Gopal P.
        • Xia P.
        • Farver C.F.
        • et al.
        A histologic basis for the efficacy of SBRT to the lung.
        J. Thorac. Oncol. 2017; 12: 510-519
        • Sher D.J.
        • Wee J.O.
        • Punglia R.S.
        Cost-effectiveness analysis of stereotactic body radiotherapy and radiofrequency ablation for medically inoperable, early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.
        Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2011; 81: 767-774
        • Shaverdian N.
        • Wang P.C.
        • Steinberg M.
        • et al.
        The patient's perspective on stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) vs. surgery for treatment of early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
        Lung Cancer. 2015; 90: 230-233
        • Aznar M.C.
        • Warren S.
        • Hoogeman M.
        • et al.
        The impact of technology on the changing practice of lung SBRT.
        Phys. Medica. 2018; 47: 129-138
        • Molitoris J.K.
        • Diwanji T.
        • Snider III J.W.
        • Mossahebi S.
        • Samanta S.
        • Badiyan S.N.
        • Simone C.B.
        • et al.
        Advances in the use of motion management and image guidance in radiation therapy treatment for lung cancer.
        J. Thorac. Dis. 2018; 10: S2437-S2450
        • Keall P.J.
        • Mageras G.S.
        • Balter J.M.
        • Emery R.S.
        • Forster K.M.
        • Jiang S.B.
        • Kapatoes J.M.
        • et al.
        The management of respiratory motion in radiation oncology report of AAPM Task Group 76 a.
        Med. Phys. 2006; 33: 3874-3900
        • Møller D.S.
        • Khalil A.A.
        • Knap M.M.
        • et al.
        Adaptive radiotherapy of lung cancer patients with pleural effusion or atelectasis.
        Radiother. Oncol. 2014; 110: 517-522
        • Chen M.
        • Yang J.
        • Liao Z.
        • Chen J.
        • Xu C.
        • He X.
        • Zhang X.
        • Zhu R.X.
        • Li H.
        • et al.
        Anatomic change over the course of treatment for non–small cell lung cancer patients and its impact on intensity-modulated radiation therapy and passive-scattering proton therapy deliveries.
        Radiat. Oncol. 2020; 15: 1-11
        • Chang J.Y.
        • Li H.
        • Zhu X.Ronald
        • Liao Z.
        • Zhao L.
        • Liu A.
        • Li Y.
        • et al.
        Clinical implementation of intensity modulated proton therapy for thoracic malignancies.
        Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2014; 90: 809-818
        • Li H.
        • Zhang X.
        • Park P.
        • Liu W.
        • Chang J.
        • Liao Z.
        • Frank S.
        • et al.
        Robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy to account for anatomy changes in lung cancer patients.
        Radiother. Oncol. 2015; 114: 367-372
        • Xia P.
        • Qi P.
        • Hwang A.
        • Kinsey E.
        • Pouliot J.
        • Roach III M.
        • et al.
        Comparison of three strategies in management of independent movement of the prostate and pelvic lymph nodes.
        Med. physics. 2010; 37: 5006-5013
        • Shang Q.
        • Sheplan Olsen L.J.
        • Stephans K.
        • Tendulkar R.
        • Xia P.
        • et al.
        Prostate rotation detected from implanted markers can affect dose coverage and cannot be simply dismissed.
        J. applied clin. Med. physics. 2013; 14: 177-191
        • Giacometti V.
        • King R.B.
        • Agnew C.E.
        • Irvine D.M.
        • Jain S.
        • Hounsell A.R.
        • McGarry C.K.
        • et al.
        An evaluation of techniques for dose calculation on cone beam computed tomography.
        Br. J. Radiol. 2019; 92 (20180383): 1-11
        • Fotina I.
        • Hopfgartner J.
        • Stock M.
        • et al.
        Feasibility of CBCT-based dose calculation: Comparative analysis of HU adjustment techniques.
        Radiotherapy and Oncol. 2012; 104: 249-256
        • Giacometti V.
        • Hounsell A.H.
        • McGarry C.K.
        A review of dose calculation approaches with cone beam CT in photon and proton therapy.
        Physica Medica. 2020; 76: 243-276