Advertisement

Tubarial salivary gland sparing with proton therapy

      Abstract

      The recently identified bilateral macroscopic tubarial salivary glands present a potential opportunity for further toxicity mitigation for patients receiving head and neck radiotherapy. Here, we show superior dosimetric sparing of the tubarial salivary glands with proton radiation therapy (PRT) compared to intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for patients treated postoperatively for human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). This was a retrospective, single institutional study of all patients treated with adjuvant PRT for HPV-associated OPSCC from 2015 to 2019. Each patient had a treatment-approved, equivalent IMRT plan to serve as a reference. The main end point was dose delivered to the tubarial salivary glands by modality, assessed via a 2-tailed, paired t-test. We also report disease outcomes for the entire cohort, via the Kaplan-Meier method. Sixty-four patients were identified. The mean RT dose to the tubarial salivary glands was 23.6 Gy (95% confidence interval (CI) 21.7 to 25.5) and 30.4 Gy (28.6 to 32.2) for PRT and IMRT plans (p < 0.0001), respectively. With a median follow-up of 25.2 months, the two-year locoregional control, progression-free survival and overall survival were 97.8% (95% CI 85.6% to 99.7%), 94.1% (82.8% to 98.1%) and 98.1% (87.4% to 99.7%), respectively. Our study suggests that meaningful normal tissue sparing of the recently identified tubarial salivary glands is achievable with PRT. The apparent gains with PRT did not impact disease outcomes, with only 1 observed locoregional recurrence (0 local, 1 regional). Further studies are warranted to explore the impact of the improved dosimetric sparing of the tubarial salivary glands conveyed by PRT on patient toxicity and quality of life.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Medical Dosimetry
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Siegel R.L.
        • Miller K.D.
        • Jemal A.
        Cancer statistics, 2020.
        CA. Cancer J. Clin. 2020; 70: 7-30https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21590
        • Senkomago V.
        • Henley S.J.
        • Thomas C.C.
        • et al.
        Human papillomavirus–attributable cancers — United States, 2012–2016.
        MMWR. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2019; 68: 724-728https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6833a3
        • Gillison M.L.
        • Koch W.M.
        • Capone R.B.
        • et al.
        Evidence for a causal association between human papillomavirus and a subset of head and neck cancers.
        J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2000; 92: 709-720https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/92.9.709
        • Ang K.K.
        • Harris J.
        • Wheeler R.
        • et al.
        Human papillomavirus and survival of patients with oropharyngeal cancer.
        N. Engl. J. Med. 2010; 363: 24-35https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0912217
        • Gillison M.L.
        • Trotti A.M.
        • Harris J.
        • et al.
        Radiotherapy plus cetuximab or cisplatin in human papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal cancer (NRG Oncology RTOG 1016): A randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority trial.
        Lancet. 2019; 393: 40-50https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32779-X
        • Kimple R.J.
        • Smith M.A.
        • Blitzer G.C.
        • et al.
        Enhanced radiation sensitivity in HPV-positive head and neck cancer.
        Cancer Res. 2013; 73: 4791-4800https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-0587
        • Pfister DG
        • Spencer S
        • Adelstein D
        • et al.
        Head and neck cancers, version 2.2020, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology.
        J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2020; 18: 873-898https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2020.0031
        • Nutting C.M.
        • Morden J.P.
        • Harrington K.J.
        • et al.
        Parotid-sparing intensity modulated versus conventional radiotherapy in head and neck cancer (PARSPORT): A phase 3 multicentre randomised controlled trial.
        Lancet Oncol. 2011; 12: 127-136https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70290-4
        • Langendijk J.A.
        • Doornaert P.
        • Verdonck-de Leeuw I.M.
        • et al.
        Impact of late treatment-related toxicity on quality of life among patients with head and neck cancer treated with radiotherapy.
        J. Clin. Oncol. 2008; 26: 3770-3776https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.14.6647
        • Van Der Laan B.F.A.M.
        • Van Der Laan H.P.
        • Bijl H.P.
        • et al.
        Acute symptoms during the course of head and neck radiotherapy or chemoradiation are strong predictors of late dysphagia.
        Radiother. Oncol. 2015; 115: 56-62https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2015.01.019
        • Van De Water T.A.
        • Lomax A.J.
        • Bijl H.P.
        • et al.
        Potential benefits of scanned intensity-modulated proton therapy versus advanced photon therapy with regard to sparing of the salivary glands in oropharyngeal cancer.
        Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2011; 79: 1216-1224https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.05.012
        • Sio T.T.
        • Lin H.K.
        • Shi Q.
        • et al.
        Intensity modulated proton therapy versus intensity modulated photon radiation therapy for oropharyngeal cancer: first comparative results of patient-reported outcomes.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016; 95: 1107-1114https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.02.044
        • Blanchard P.
        • Garden A.S.
        • Gunn G.B.
        • et al.
        Intensity-modulated proton beam therapy (IMPT) versus intensity-modulated photon therapy (IMRT) for patients with oropharynx cancer – A case matched analysis.
        Radiother. Oncol. 2016; 120: 48-55https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2016.05.022
        • Holliday E.B.
        • Kocak-Uzel E.
        • Feng L.
        • et al.
        Dosimetric advantages of intensity-modulated proton therapy for oropharyngeal cancer compared with intensity-modulated radiation: A case-matched control analysis.
        Med. Dosim. 2016; 41: 189-194https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meddos.2016.01.002
        • Van Der Laan H.P.
        • Van De Water T.A.
        • Van Herpt H.E.
        • et al.
        The potential of intensity-modulated proton radiotherapy to reduce swallowing dysfunction in the treatment of head and neck cancer: A planning comparative study.
        Acta Oncol. (Madr). 2013; 52: 561-569https://doi.org/10.3109/0284186X.2012.692885
        • Sharma S.
        • Zhou O.
        • Thompson R.
        • et al.
        Quality of life of postoperative photon versus proton radiation therapy for oropharynx cancer.
        Int. J. Part. Ther. 2019; 5: 11-17https://doi.org/10.14338/IJPT-18-00032.1
        • Mohan H.
        • Tahlan A.
        • Mundi I.
        • et al.
        Non-neoplastic salivary gland lesions: A 15-year study.
        Eur. Arch. Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 2011; 268: 1187-1190https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-010-1460-3
        • Tos M.
        Mucous glands in the developing human rhinopharynx.
        Laryngoscope. 1977; 87: 987-995https://doi.org/10.1288/00005537-197706000-00016
        • Holmberg K.V.
        • Hoffman M.P.
        Anatomy, biogenesis and regeneration of salivary glands.
        Monogr. Oral Sci. 2014; : 1-13https://doi.org/10.1159/000358776
        • Ghannam M.G.
        • Singh P.
        Anatomy, Head and Neck, Salivary Glands. 2021 Jun 11.
        StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island, FL2021
        • Valstar M.H.
        • de Bakker B.S.
        • Steenbakkers R.J.H.M.
        • et al.
        The tubarial salivary glands: A potential new organ at risk for radiotherapy.
        Radiother. Oncol. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2020.09.034
        • Bernier J.
        • Cooper J.S.
        • Pajak T.F.
        • et al.
        Defining risk levels in locally advanced head and neck cancers: A comparative analysis of concurrent postoperative radiation plus chemotherapy trials of the EORTC (#22931) and RTOG (#9501).
        Head Neck. 2005; 27: 843-850https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.20279
        • Brouwer C.L.
        • Steenbakkers R.J.H.M.
        • Bourhis J.
        • et al.
        CT-based delineation of organs at risk in the head and neck region: DAHANCA, EORTC, GORTEC, HKNPCSG, NCIC CTG, NCRI, NRG Oncology and TROG consensus guidelines.
        Radiother. Oncol. 2015; 117: 83-90https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2015.07.041
        • Evans M.
        • Beasley M.
        Target delineation for postoperative treatment of head and neck cancer.
        Oral Oncol. 2018; 86: 288-295https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.08.011
        • Yom S.S.
        • Torres-Saavedra P.
        • Caudell J.J.
        • et al.
        NRG-HN002: A randomized phase II trial for patients with p16-positive, non-smoking-associated, locoregionally advanced oropharyngeal cancer.
        Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. 2019; 105: 684-685https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.08.038
        • Eisbruch A.
        • Gregoire V.
        Balancing risk and reward in target delineation for highly conformal radiotherapy in head and neck cancer.
        Semin. Radiat. Oncol. 2009; : 43-52https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semradonc.2008.09.008
        • Bentzen S.M.
        • Constine L.S.
        • Deasy J.O.
        • et al.
        Quantitative analyses of normal tissue effects in the clinic (QUANTEC): An introduction to the scientific issues.
        Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2010; S3: 76https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.09.040
        • Deasy J.O.
        • Moiseenko V.
        • Marks L.
        • et al.
        Radiotherapy dose-volume effects on salivary gland function.
        Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2010; 76: S58https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.06.090