Advertisement
Research Article|Articles in Press

Diversity of medical dosimetry applicants and graduates

      Abstract

      Diversity is a critical component in the advancement of human endeavor in science. Students who complete their education and training at diverse schools can serve patients from a wide range of ethnic backgrounds and promote cross-cultural competence. However, developing a diverse environment of professionals is a long-term effort which often takes generations to complete. Increasing awareness of underrepresented genders and/or minorities helps to establish goals for building a future of improved diversity. Specific to radiation oncology, professions such as medical physicists and radiation oncology physicians have reported underrepresented females and minorities. The problem is that there is a paucity of literature regarding diversity of medical dosimetry professionals. The professional organization does not track diversity data for those members currently working in the profession. Therefore, the purpose of this research was to present aggregate data demonstrating the diversity of medical dosimetry applicants and graduates. The methodology involved quantitative data collection from medical dosimetry program directors which answered the research question, what is the diversity of medical dosimetry applicants and graduates? In comparison to the U.S. population, there were less applicant and accepted students of Hispanic/Latino and African American ethnicities whereas the Asian population was higher. While the U.S. population data reveals 3% more females, there were 35% more female than male applicant and accepted students in this study. However, the results differ significantly from medical physics and radiation oncology physicians with only 30% female clinicians.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Medical Dosimetry
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • van Zyl M
        • Haynes EMK
        • Batchelar D
        • Jakobi JM.
        Examining gender diversity growth as a model for inclusion of all underrepresented persons in medical physics.
        Med Phys. 2020; 47: 5976-5985https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.14524
        • Campbell LG
        • Mehtani S
        • Dozier ME
        • Rinehart J.
        Gender-heterogenous working groups produce higher quality science.
        PLoS One. 2013; 8: e79147https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079147
        • Chapman CH
        • Jagsi R.
        The ethical imperative and evidence-based strategies to ensure equity and diversity in radiation oncology.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017; 99: 269-274https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.04.015
        • Rosenkranz KM
        • Arora TK
        • Termuhlen PM
        • et al.
        Diversity equity and inclusion in medicine: Why it matters and how do we achieve it?.
        J Surg Educ. 2021; 78: 1058-1065https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.11.013
        • Holliday EB
        • Siker M
        • Chapman CH
        • et al.
        Achieving gender equity in the radiation oncology physician workforce.
        Adv Radiat Oncol. 2018; 3: 478-483https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2018.09.003
        • Vengaloor Thomas TV
        • Perekattu Kuruvilla T
        • Bhanat E
        • et al.
        Gender disparities in radiation oncology residency programs in the United States—Current status.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019; : S64-S65https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.06.510
        • Chapman CH
        • Hwang WT
        • Deville C.
        Diversity based on race, ethnicity, and sex, of the US radiation oncology physician workforce.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013; 85: 912-918https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.08.020
        • Deville C
        • Cruickshank I
        • Chapman CH
        • et al.
        I can't breathe: The continued disproportionate exclusion of black physicians in the United States radiation oncology workforce.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020; 108: 856-863https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.07.015
        • Pollard-Larkin JM
        • Paradis KC
        • Moran JM
        • Martel MK
        • Rong Y.
        Voices for gender equity in medical physics.
        J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2018; 19: 6-10https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12487
        • Tsapaki V
        • Tabakov S
        • Rehani MM.
        Medical physics workforce: A global perspective.
        Phys Medica. 2018; 55: 33-39https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.10.012
        • Covington EL
        • Moran JM
        • Paradis KC.
        The state of gender diversity in medical physics.
        Med Phys. 2023; 47: 2038-2043https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.14035
        • Porter AM.
        • Ivie R
        Women in Physics and Astronomy.
        American Institute of Physics, 2019 (Available at:) (Accessed Dec 2022)
        • Hendrickson KRG
        • Avery SM
        • Castillo R
        • et al.
        2021 AAPM equity, diversity, and inclusion climate survey executive summary.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2023; 116 (S0360-3016(22)00178-X): 295-304https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.02.030
        • Rankin J
        • Whelan B
        • Pollard-Larkin J
        • et al.
        Diversity and professional advancement in medical physics.
        Adv Radiat Oncol. 2022; 8101057https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2022.101057
        • Valentine P
        • Wynn J
        • McLean D.
        Improving diversity in the health professions.
        N C Med J. 2016; 77: 137-140https://doi.org/10.18043/ncm.77.2.137
        • Colby SL
        • Ortman JM.
        Projections of the size and composition of the U.S. population: 2014 to 2060. Report No. P25-1143.
        United States Census Bureau. 2015; (Available at:) (Accessed Feb 2023)
        • Cliffordson C
        • Askling B
        Different grounds for admission: Its effects on recruitment and achievement in medical education.
        Scand J Educ Res. 2006; 50: 45-62https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830500372026
        • Atchinson KA
        • Friedman JA
        • Freed JR
        • Jackson D.
        The pipeline program at the University of Washington school of dentistry.
        J Dent Educ. 2009; 73: S148-S160https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2009.73.2_suppl.tb04678.x
        • Arnett MR
        • Forde R.
        Increasing student diversity and cultural competence as part of Loma Linda University schools of dentistry's service mission.
        J Dent Educ. 2012; 76: 721-727https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2012.76.6.tb05306.x
        • Awe C
        • Bauman J.
        Theoretical and conceptual framework for a high school pathways to pharmacy program.
        Am J Pharm Educ. 2010; 74: 149https://doi.org/10.5688/aj7408149
        • Albert AA
        • Knoll MA
        • Doke K
        • et al.
        #WomenWhoCurie: Leveraging social media to promote women in radiation oncology.
        Adv Radiat Oncol. 2019; 4: 218-225https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2019.01.003
        • American Association of Medical Dosimetrists
        Future Trends in the Supply of and Demand for Medical Dosimetrists.
        Workforce Study, 2021 (Technical Report #4 by Christine Swanson and Michael D Mills. Available at:) (Accessed Sep 2022)
      1. U.S. Census Bureau. Quick Facts Published 2022. Available at: https://www.census.gov/. Accessed Jun 2022.

        • Lenards N.
        A quantitative comparative study of medical dosimetry graduates with and without prior radiation therapy certification.
        Med Dosim. 2020; 45: 374-381https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meddos.2020.05.005
        • Green R
        • Karavatas S.
        Increasing diversity in the physical therapy profession by addressing deficiencies in the performance of African Americans on the national physical therapy examination.
        J Pract Health Prof Divers. 2018; 11 (Available at:) (Accessed Nov 2022): 51-59
        • Hardy D.
        How race and class relate to standardized tests.
        The Notebook. 2015 (Available at:) (Accessed Nov 2022)
        • Santoso AP
        • Jupitz S
        • Lin C.
        A framework for developing community-focused medical physics outreach programs.
        J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021; 22: 305-314https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13413